期刊文献+

宫颈不典型鳞状细胞310例临床分析

原文传递
导出
摘要 [目的]探讨性质未定的宫颈不典型鳞状上皮细胞(ASCUS)的临床意义及进一步处理的临床路径。[方法]对宫颈液基细胞学检查(TCT)中被诊断为ASCUS的310例进行高危型HPV-DNA检测和阴道镜下活检。[结果]宫颈ASCUS患者中,CINⅠ级65例(20.9%)、CINⅡ级13例(5.9%)、CINⅢ级3例(1.0%),宫颈癌2例(0.6%),宫颈尖疣46例(14.8%)。高危型HPV阳性者CINⅠ检出率为61.3%(65/106);高危型HPV阴性者CINI检出率11.3%(23/204),高危型HPV阳性者CIN检出率较高(2=85.94,P<0.01)。[结论]对诊断为ASCUS的患者应予足够重视,HPV-DNA检测和阴道镜检查是进一步处理的有效手段;HR-HPV检测对ASCUS患者的分流具有重要意义,高危HPV阳性或无条件随访的患者可直接行阴道镜检查。
作者 叶健文
出处 《海峡预防医学杂志》 CAS 2009年第6期87-89,共3页 Strait Journal of Preventive Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Kurman RJ, Henson DE, Herbst AL,et al. Interim guidelines for management of abnormal cervical cytology[J]. JAMA, 1994,271 (4):1886-1869.
  • 2Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R, et al. The 2001 Bethesda Systern: terminology for reporting r esults Of cervical cytology[J]. JAMA,2002,287:2140-2141.
  • 3潘敏,莫伯辉.72例宫颈细胞学ASCUS诊断的病理分析[J].现代实用医学,2006,18(9):640-641. 被引量:14
  • 4苏涛,章桂红,程利南.液基薄层细胞学技术在宫颈病变筛查中的应用及评价[J].国外医学(妇产科学分册),2004,31(4):252-255. 被引量:112
  • 5Mayeaux EJ,Harper MB,Abreo F,et al. A comparison of thereli ability of repeat cervical smears and eolposcopy in patients with abnormal cervical cytology[J]. J Fam Prac,1995,,10:572-56.
  • 6Bosch FX,Manos MM,Munoz N,et al. Prevalence of human Papillomavirus in cervical cancer:workwide perspective International biological study on serviced cancer (IBSCC) study Grnup [J]. J Nati cancer Inst,1995,87:796-802.
  • 7魏丽惠.子宫颈病变诊治进展[C].首届宫颈癌诊治防高研班参考资料,2006.

二级参考文献23

  • 1苏涛,章桂红,程利南.液基薄层细胞学技术在宫颈病变筛查中的应用及评价[J].国外医学(妇产科学分册),2004,31(4):252-255. 被引量:112
  • 2Sulik SM, Kroeger K, Schultz JK, et al. Are fluid-based cytologies superior to the conventional papanicolaou test? a systematic review. J Fam Pract, 2001,50(12):1040-1046.
  • 3Ries L, Kosary C, Hanky B, et al. SEER cancer statistics review,1973~1995. Bethesda,MD:National Cancer Institute, 1998.
  • 4Hutchinson ML, Cassin CM, Ball HG. The efficacy of an automated preparation device for cervical cytology. Am J Clin Pathol, 1991,96(3):300-305.
  • 5Sprenger E, Schwarzmann P, Kirkpatrick M, et al. The false negative rate in cervical cytology. Acta Cytol, 1996,40(1):81-89.
  • 6Pajtler M, Audy-Jurkovic S. Pap smear adequacy-is the assessing criterion induding endocervical cells really valid? Coll Antropol, 2002,26(2):565-570.
  • 7Cheung AN, Szeto EF, Leung BS, et al. Liquid-based cytology and conventional cervical smears: a comparison study in an Asian screening population. Cancer,2003,99(6):331-335.
  • 8Abulafia O, Pezzullo JC, Sherer DM. Performance of ThinPrep liquidbased cervical cytology in comparison with conventionally prepared Papanicolaou smears: a quant itative survey. Gynecol Oncol, 2003,90(1):137-144.
  • 9Hutchinson ML, Zahniser DJ, Sherman ME, et al. Utility of liquid-based cytology for cervical carcinoma screening. Cancer, 1999,87(2):48-55.
  • 10Maxwell GL, Carlson JW, Ochoa M, et al. Costs and effectiveness of alternative strategies for cervical cancer screening in military beneficiaries. Obstet Gynocol, 2002,100(4):740-748.

共引文献124

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部