摘要
目的：乳胶增强透射免疫比浊法和速率散射免疫比浊法检测C-反应蛋白结果的比较；方法：收集80名确诊为肺部感染、冠心病或肿瘤患者，采用两种检测方法分析血清C-反应蛋白浓度；结果：当C-反应蛋白浓度低于5mg／L时，两种检测方法相关性较C-反应蛋白sg＆大于5mg／L时差；C-反应蛋白浓度大于5mg／L时两种方法相关性较好，高达0．994；当C-反应蛋白浓度较低（小于2mg／L）或大于1Omg／L时，速率散射免疫比浊法较乳胶增强透射免疫比浊法精确；结论：乳胶增强透射免疫比浊法和速率散射免疫比浊法检测结果具有较好的相关性，当C-反应蛋白浓度于2mg／L或大于10mg／L时，速率散射免疫比浊法优于乳胶增强透射免疫比浊法。
Objective：To compare the analysis of C-reaction protein by latex enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay and rate nephelometric immunoassay. Method：We enrolled 80 patients diagnosed as pneumonia, coronary artery disease or cancer and we used these two methods to evaluate serum CRP level. Result：The correlation between these two methods is lower when CRP is less than 5mg/L than CRP is higher than 5mg/L When CRP is higher than 5mg/L, the correlation between these two methods is well （r=0.994）. When CRP is lower than 2mg/ml or higher than 10mg/L, the accuracy by rate nephelometric immunoassay is high than latex enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay. Conclusion： The correlation between latex enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay and rate nephelometric immunoassay is similar, but hen CRP is lower than 2mg/L or higher than 10mg/L, rate nephelometric immunoassay is better than latex enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay.
出处
《中医临床研究》
2009年第23期101-102,共2页
Clinical Journal Of Chinese Medicine
