摘要
经典注释活动是古代经典传承的重要方式之一。此类传承活动,须经过注释主体的理解、解释两个不同阶段,是一传意的过程。无论是在理解还是解释的过程中,受传意目标的影响,往往形成不同的注释结果及对此的评论。这既是学术的论争,也是以经典为依傍的学术发展路径。不同历史时期的经典注释目标,按主观性大小分为重主观性、重客观性、将主观性与客观性结合起来三类。任何一类目标的确立都是对前代的批判与否定。研究经典注释史不可轻信某一目标下的评论及断语,因为典籍注释均是主观性与客观性相统一的行为,只是存在客观性程度上的区别。
Classics notation is an important way to pass on the classics＇s values. Classics notation action is make up of two stages of comprehension and annotation. Because of the diffencence of classics notation Objects, it had formed many kinds of effection and commentary. According to subjetctivity of classics notation object in historical period, classics notation can be divided into three kinds： subjectivity, objectivty and vinculum of subjectivity and objectivty. The establishment of every kinds of classics notation object, must based on the animadvertion and negation on the previous generation＇s works. Classics notation action is an unification of subjectivity and objectivty, but has difference in degree.
出处
《古籍整理研究学刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第6期30-34,12,共6页
Journal of Ancient Books Collation and Studies
基金
陕西省哲学社会科学规划项目"典籍注释传意研究"(08L002)
关键词
经典注释
经典传意
注释传意目标
classics notation
the cummunication of classics
objects of classics notation
