摘要
我国国家所有权理论在当代面临质疑,对此可考虑重拾将国家财产分为"公产"与"私产"、国家对二者存在不同的权利能力与权能的分类法,但又结合我国法律传统——在延续国家财产民法整体调整传统方法的前提下,围绕实现公共利益的根本目标,回应公共财产客体功能的特殊性及由此产生的法律调整方法特殊性要求,吸收与改造大陆法国家"公产"与"私产"二分体制,构建公共所有权向私人所有权循序过渡的类型序列,由此开拓我国国家所有权理论及其实践的当代出路。
Now that China's state proprietary rights were questioned contemporarily,we could reconsider to separate state-owned properties into 'publicly owned' and 'privately owned' ,and state could treat the two differently on the power and capability of rights. However,with regard to the convention of Chinese law – under the premise of succeeding the conventional state proprietary civil law with an objective of realizing mutual benefits,responding to the specialty of the function of public properties and from which,the special need of altering the law,absorbing and reforming the binomial system of 'publicly owned' and 'privately owned' under continental law system,we construct the transitional series for public proprietary rights to migrate to private proprietary rights.
出处
《浙江社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第12期25-33,共9页
Zhejiang Social Sciences
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目A级<改革发展成果分享法律机制研究>(项目编号:05&ZD029)
司法部法治建设与法学理论研究部级科研项目<国有资产的利用与保障制度研究>(项目编号:05SFB3014)研究成果
关键词
国家所有权的质疑
公产与私产
罗马法
俄罗斯民法
物权法
Questioning on State Proprietary Rights,'Publicly Owned' and 'Privately Owned' Properties,Roman Law,Russian Civil Law,Proprietary Rights Law
