期刊文献+

假阳性结果报告率在分子流行病学研究中的应用 被引量:5

原文传递
导出
摘要 分子流行病学研究中通常面临这样的问题:初期具有统计学意义的遗传关联性研究,即使样本量大,实施很好,避免了所有研究偏倚,其研究结果为假阳性的概率却仍很高,研究表明至少为95%,我们称之为有统计学意义的研究结果下无真实关联的概率,即假阳性报告率(false positive report probability,FPRP)
出处 《中华预防医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第12期1141-1142,共2页 Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Freely associating. Nat Genet, 1999, 22 : 1-2.
  • 2Colhoun HM, McKeigue PM, Davey Smith G. Problems of reporting genetic associations with complex outcomes. Lancet, 2003, 361:865-872.
  • 3Ioannidis JP, Ntzani EE, Trikalinos TA, et al. Replication validity of genetic association studies (Review). Nat Genet, 2001, 29:306-309.
  • 4Sterne JA, Davey SG. Sifting the evidence-what's wrong with significance tests? (Review). BMJ, 2001, 322:226-231.
  • 5Wacholder S, Charlock S, Garcia-Closas M, et al. Assessing the probability that a positive report is false: an approach for molecular epidemiology studies. J Natl Cancer Inst, 200d, 96:434-442.
  • 6Little J, Bradley L, Bray MS, et al. Reporting, appraising, and integrating data on genotype prevalence and gene-disease associations(Review). Am J Epidemiol,2002, 156:300-310.
  • 7Engel LS, Taioli E, Pfeiffer R, et al. Pooled analysis and meta- analysis of glutathione S-transferase M1 and bladder cancer: a HuGE review(Review). Am J Epidemiol,2002 ,156 :95-109.
  • 8Park SL, Chang SC, Cai L, et al. Associations between variants of the 8q24 chromosome and nine smoking-related cancer sites. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2008,17:3193-3202.
  • 9Amundadottir LT, Sulem P, Gudmundsson J, et al. A common variant associated with prostate cancer in European and African populations. Nat Genet, 2006, 38:652-658.
  • 10Schumacher FR, Feigelson HS, Cox DG, et al. A common 8q24 variant in prostate and breast cancer from a large nested case- control study. Cancer Res, 2007, 67:2951-2956.

同被引文献29

引证文献5

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部