摘要
侦查人员出庭作证已列入我国新一轮司法改革方案之中,但理论界对侦查人员出庭作证的法律依据一直存在争论。有的认为《刑事诉讼法》第48条规定的"证人"包含了侦查人员,此条即为侦查人员出庭作证的法律依据;也有的认为《刑事诉讼法》第28条关于侦查人员应当回避的规定实际上否定了侦查人员出庭作证的资格。笔者对上述意见概不同意,认为在我国现行刑事诉讼法上侦查人员出庭作证是有依据的,只是不够直接、明确,应当根据侦查人员的法定职责、审判活动的实际需要、侦查人员及侦查工作的特殊性等因素完善侦查人员出庭作证的法律依据。
Investigator testifying in court has been included in our nation's new round reform of justice system.While its legal basis is still a matter of controversy in theory.Some believe that the witness stipulated in the article 48 clause of Criminal Procedural Law include investigator,which is the legal basis for investigator testifying in court.Others think that the withdrawal of investigator stipulated in the article 28 clause of Criminal Procedural Law denies the competence of investigato appearing in court.I don't agree with the foresaid opinions.I hold the idea that there is legal basis for investigator giving evidence in court,thouth the provision is not clear enough.It is necessary to perfect the correlative system and legal basis of the issue according to following factors,such as investigator's statutory resbonsibilities,actural needs of trial,specificity of investigation,etc.
出处
《法学家》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第6期120-125,共6页
The Jurist
关键词
侦查人员
出庭作证
法律依据
Investigator
Testifying in Court
Legal Basis
