期刊文献+

直肠癌CT分期与手术病理分期对照分析 被引量:2

Comparison between CT and Pathologic Stage of Rectal Carcinoma
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的 :研究直肠 CT分期与手术中病理所见的关系。方法 :回顾 31例直肠癌术前 CT分期与手术病理分期进行比较 , 和 期的准确率为 85 .7% , a期为 45 .5 % , b 期是 75 % , 期为 10 0 % ,平均 6 7.7%。结果提示 CT能较准确估计直肠的厚度 ,与周围器官的关系及有否远处转移 ,但对直肠周脂肪侵犯及淋巴转移的估计欠佳。结论 :CT对直肠癌术前分期具有一定意义。 Objective:To compare the CT and pathologic stage of rectal carcinoma.Methods: Comparison with CT stage with pathologic stage in 31 patients of rectal carcinoma was carried out retrospectively.Results: In this series the accurate rate of CT stage Ⅰ,Ⅱ,Ⅲ a,Ⅲ b,and stage Ⅳ of rectal carcinoma was 85.7%,45.5%,75%,and 100% respectively, the total accurate rate of CT stage of rectal carcinoma was 67.7%.CT can estimate the thickness of rectum and detect the rectal carcinoma having to invasion to the neighbouring and distant organs,but CT is not effective in evaluating lymph node metastases and invasion of rectal carcinoma to the fatty tissues around the rectum.Conclusion:CT may play an important role in preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma.
机构地区 北京医院
出处 《中国肿瘤临床与康复》 1998年第4期10-11,共2页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology and Rehabilitation
关键词 CT 直肠癌 分期 病理 外科手术 CT,Rectal carcinoma,Stage.
  • 相关文献

同被引文献20

  • 1CANCE W G, CDHEN A M, ENKER W E, et al. Predictive value of a ncgative computed tomographic scan in 100 patients with vectal carcinoma[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 1991,34(9) :748.
  • 2YAMASAKI S, KUMASHIRO R, YOSHITAKE H, et al. Clinical significance of flow cytometric DNA analysis in patients with rectal cancer[J]. Can To Kagaku Ryoho, 1993,20(6) :775 - 779.
  • 3HEIMANN T M,MARTINELLI G,SZPORN A, et al. Prognostic significance of DNA content abnormalities in young patients with colorectal cancer[J]. Ann Stag, 1989,210(6) :792 - 795.
  • 4EMDIN S O,STENLING R,ROOS G. Prognostic value of DNA content in colorectal carcinoma. A flow cytometric study with some methodologic aspects[J]. Cancer, 1987,60(6) : 1282 - 1287.
  • 5ARMITAGE N C, ROBINS R A,EVANS D R,et al. The influence of turnout cell DNA abnormalities on survival in colorectal cancer[J]. Br J Surg, 1985,72(10) :828 - 830.
  • 6HEIMANN T M, MILLER F, MARTINCLLI G, et al. Significance of DNA content abnormalities in small rectal cancers[J]. Am F J Sarg, 1999,159(2) : 199 - 202.
  • 7KUMAR P P,GOOD R R,JONES E O, et al. Contrastcnhancing computed tomography ring in glioblastoma multiformc after intraoperative endocurietherapy[ J]. Cancer, 1988, 61 (9) : 1759 -1765.
  • 8Tribukait B, Hammarberg C, Ruio C. lloidy and proliferation patterns in colorectal adenocarcinomas relating to Dukes classifiration and to his pathological differentiation. Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand(A). 1983,91(5):89.
  • 9Heimann TM, Miller F, Martinelli G, et al. Significance of DNA content abnormalities in small rectal cancers, Am J Surg, 1990,159(2):199-203.
  • 10Barlogie B, Drewinko B,Schumann J,et al. Cellular DNA content as a marker of neoplasia in man. Am J Med, 1980, 69(2):195-200.

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部