期刊文献+

新辅助化疗对乳腺癌的组织学分级和生物学指标表达的影响 被引量:13

Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on histologic grade and expression of biological markers in breast cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨新辅助化疗对乳腺癌的组织学分级和生物学指标表达的影响。方法67例接受新辅助化疗的原发性乳腺癌女性患者在化疗前均有核芯针活检结果作为组织学诊断依据,化疗后效果的组织学评估参照日本乳腺癌学会制定的判定标准,分为无效(G1)、轻度有效(G2)、中度有效(G3)、显著有效(G4)和完全有效(G5)5级。采用免疫组化EnVision法对化疗前后的肿瘤组织进行染色,比较化疗前后雌激素受体(ER)、孕激素受体(PR)、人表皮生长因子受体2(Her-2)和Ki-67的表达变化。结果全组67例患者化疗效果的组织学评估结果显示,G1、G2、C3、G4和G5的患者分别为5例(7.5%)、19例(28.4%)、20例(29.9%)、17例(25.4%)和6例(9.0%)。全组有49例患者在化疗前后具有ER、PR、Her-2和Ki-67表达情况的评估结果。化疗后PR阳性率为71.4%,与化疗前(91.8%)相比,差异有统计学意义(P=0.021);而化疗前后ER和Her-2的表达保持稳定。14例浸润性导管癌患者在新辅助化疗后组织学分级发生变化,其中降1级者12例,占85.7%。新辅助化疗后,组织学分级有变化者在G1、G2、G3和G4组中所占的比例分别为0、5.9%、41.2%和54.5%(P=0.013)。Ki-67的平均表达率从化疗前的28.3%下降到化疗后的11.0%(P=0.011)。化疗后Ki-67的表达率下降〉10%、〉20%、〉30%、〉40%和〉50%者在G1和G2组、G3组、G4和G5组中所占的比例均呈增加趋势,且差异均有统计学意义(均P〈0.05)。结论新辅助化疗后,乳腺癌组织的PR表达显著降低,而ER和Her-2的表达保持稳定;乳腺癌组织的组织学分级和Ki-67的表达也降低,并且好的化疗效果与组织学分级和Ki-67的表达降低相关。 Objective The aim of this study is to investigate the changes of expression of estrogen receptors (ER), progesterone receptors (PR), Her-2, Ki-67 and histological grade after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Methods Sixty-seven patients with histopathalogically confirmed breast cancer by core needle biopsy received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was assessed according to the criteria of the Japanese Breast Cancer Society : non-effective ( G1 ), mildly effective ( G2), moderately effective ( G3 ), markedly effective (G4) and completely effective ( G5 ). All pathological slides were retrospectively reviewed. Immunohistochemical staining (EnVision method) was used to detect the expression of ER and PR, Her-2 and Ki-67. The pre- and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy status of tumor histological grade, ER and PR, Her-2 and Ki-67 expression in the 49 cases were compared. Results The effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was assessed in 67 patients. There were 5 cases (7.5%) in G1, 19 in G2 (28.4%), 20 in G3 (29.9%), 17 in G4 (25.4%) and 6 in G5 (9.0%), respectively. PR positive rate was 71.4% after chemotherapy versus 91.8% before chemotherapy, with a statistically significant reduction (P = 0.021 ). However, the ER and Her-2 expression before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was stable. Of the patients with invasive ductal carcinoma, 28.6% had histological grade change after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and 85.7% of patients decreased one grade. The proportion of histological grade change in the G1, G2, G3, G4 were 0, 5.9%, 41.2% and 54.5%, respectively (P = 0.013). The average rate of Ki-67 expression decreased from 28.3% pre-chemotherapy to 11.0% postchemotherapy (P = 0. 011 ). After the neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the Ki-67 expression rate decreased by 〉 10%, 〉20%, 〉30%, 〉40% and 〉50% in 3 groups (G1 and G2, group G3, group G4 and G5) showed a tendency to be increased, with a significant difference ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion PR expression in breast cancer decreases after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, while ER and Her-2 expressions remain stable. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the histological grade and proliferation index are decreased and correlated with the response to chemotherapy. Therefore, histological grade and proliferation index may be effective complementary factors in assessment of the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
出处 《中华肿瘤杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第11期858-862,共5页 Chinese Journal of Oncology
关键词 乳腺肿瘤 雌激素受体 孕激素受体 人表皮生长因子受体2 增殖指数 Breast neoplasms Estrogen receptor Progesterone receptor Her-2 Proliferation index
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Fisher ER,Wang J,Bryant J,et al.Pathobiology of preoperative chemotherapy:findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) Protocol B-18.Cancer,2002,95:681-695.
  • 2黑住 吕史,秋山 太,岩濑 拓士,ほか.組織学的治瘵效果の判定基準//小林俊三,芳贺骏介,秋山太,はか.臨床·病理乳腺癌取ぁつかい規約.第15版.東京:金原出版株式会社,2004:78-80.
  • 3Wolff AC,Hammond ME,Schwartz JN,et al.American Society of Clinical Ontology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2testing in breast cancer.J Clin Oncol,2007,25:118-145.
  • 4Taucher S,Rudas M,Gnant M,et al.Sequential steroid hormone receptor measurements in primary breast cancer with and without intervening primary chemotherapy.Endoer Relat Cancer,2003,10:91-98.
  • 5Arens N,Bleyl U,Hildenbrand R,et al.HER2/neu,p53,Ki67,and hormone receptors do not change during neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.Virchows Arch,2005,446:489-496.
  • 6Paik S,Park C.HER-2 and choice of adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.Semin Oncol,2001,28:332-335.
  • 7Adams AL,Eltoum I,Krontiras H,et al.The effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on histologic grade,hormone receptor status,and HER2/neu status in breast carcinoma.Breast J,2008,14:141-146.
  • 8Hannemann J,Oosterkamp HM,Bosch CA,et al.Changes in gene expression associated with response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.J Clin Oncol,2005,23:3331-3342.
  • 9Kasami M,Uematsu T,Honda M,et al.Comparison of estrogen receptor,progesterone receptor and Her-2 status in breast cancer pre-and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Breast,2008,17:523-527.
  • 10Chang J,Ormerod M,Powles TJ,et al.Apoptosis and proliferatian as predictors of chemotherapy response in patients with breast carcinoma.Cancer,2000,89:2145-2152.

同被引文献148

引证文献13

二级引证文献68

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部