中国地区能源强度差异研究——要素禀赋的分析视角被引量：17

The Research of Regional Energy Intensity Difference in China—from the Factor Endowment Perspective

下载PDF

导出

摘要本文借助一个纳入能源要素的科布道格拉斯生产函数，首先通过数理分析，研究了能源、资本和劳动力三种要素禀赋对各地区能源强度差异的影响机理和作用方向，提出能源要素越丰裕、资本要素和劳动要素越匮乏，则能源相对价格越低，从而能源强度越高的理论命题；然后利用1995—2006年我国各地区能源强度的相关面板数据，运用OLS和GMM模型对理论命题进行计量经济学实证检验，证实了命题的真实性。这一结论对于当前与未来全国推进与落实节能减排、降低能耗的政策目标，具有重要的理论意义与现实意义。 This article focus on the regional energy intensity difference in china by using a C-D production function with factor endowment. Firstly ,we analysis the impact on energy intensity from the factor endowments in Mathematical Methods, and then promote the theoretical proposition：Relatively abundant factor endowment makes relatively inexpensive factor, so as to promote greater use of the factor of the region, and then have an impact on energy intensity in the region ; Secondly, using the relevant panel data of china＇s various regions in 1995--2006, this article tested the impact on the regional energy intensity in china of energy endowment, capital endowment, labor endowments, FDI and the proportion of primary industry, as well as the proportion of secondary industry, with OLS and GMM models respectively. The empirical results confirm the theoretical proposition. The conclusion of this paper has important theoretical and practical significance for the current and future of our country in promoting and implementing energy-saving policy.

作者王军仲伟周

机构地区西安交通大学经济与金融学院

出处《产业经济研究》 CSSCI 2009年第6期44-51,共8页 Industrial Economics Research

基金 "通用汽车.中国发展研究青年奖学金"博士论文奖学金教育部"新世纪优秀人才资助计划"(项目编号:NCET-08-0450) 西安交通大学"985工程"二期项目(项目编号:07200701)的联合资助。

关键词能源要素禀赋能源强度 energy factor endowment energy intensity

分类号 F403.6 [经济管理—产业经济]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献33

1Jenne, C. A. , Cattell, R. K. ,1983,"Structural Change and Energy Efficiency in Industry" ,Energy Economics,5 (2) : 114-123.
2Marlay, R. C. ,1984,"Trends in Industrial Use of Energy" ,Science,226:1277.
3Boyd, G. ,McDonald J. F. ,Ross, M. ,et al. 1987, "Separating the Changing Composition of US Manufacturing Production from Energy Efficiency Improvements:A Divisia Index Approach", Energy, 8 (2) :77-96.
4Smil Vaclav, 1990, China's Energy, Washington, D. C : Office of Technology Assessment, Report Prepared for the U. S. Congress.
5Kambara Tarsu, 1992 ," The Energy Situation in China", China Quarterly, 131:608-636.
6Sinton, J. E. , Levine, M. D. , 1994,"Changing Energy. Intensity in Chinese Industry:the Relative Importance of Structural Shift and Intensity Change", Energy Policy,22:239-255.
7Lin, X. , Polenske, K. R. 1995, "Input-Output Anatomy of China's Energy Use Changes in the 1980s" ,Economic Systems Research, 7 ( 1 ) :67-84.
8Garbaceio, R.F., Ho, M.S., Jorgenson, D. W. ,1999,"Why Has the Energy-Output Ratio Fallen in China" ,Energy Journal,20(3 ) :63-91.
9Zhang, Z.X. ,2003 ," Why Did the Energy Intensity Fall in China's Industry Sector in the 1990s? The Relative Importance of Struetural Change and Intensity Change", Energy Economics ,25:625-638.
10Wu, Libo, Shinji, Kaneko, Shunji, Matsuoka. ,2005, "Driving Forces behind the Stagnancy of China's Energy-Related CO2 Emissions from 1996 to 1999:the Relative Importance of Structural Change, Intensity Change and Scale Change", Energy Policy,33:319-335.