期刊文献+

官僚作风和行政腐败对创业及融资的影响 被引量:8

Effects of bureaucratism and administrative corruption on entrepreneurship and start-up financing
原文传递
导出
摘要 利用一个生产个体项目选择的模型,揭示了官僚作风和腐败都阻碍企业经营活动,恶化金融市场,影响金融市场的产出,反过来也强化了官僚作风和官僚腐败的负面效应,从而增加了创业企业融资的成本,打击了个体参与经济活动的积极性,影响了企业创业融资的效率,阻碍了创业企业的发展,破坏了社会经济绩效. With a model of occupational choice,this article studies the effects of bureaucratism and corruption, and points out that endogenous bureaucratism and corruption deter entrepreneurial activities, compound the negative effects of both aggregate uncertainty and capital market frictions,and deteriorate financial market outcomes.These consequences in turn worsen the negative effects of the bureaucratism and corruption.Consequently,they increase the cost of entrepreneurial start-up financing,impact their actively entry and efficiency,block their development,suppress individual enthusiasm of engaging in entrepreneurial activity,and breach the performance of society and economy.
作者 南旭光
出处 《系统工程理论与实践》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2009年第11期93-99,共7页 Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice
基金 重庆市自然科学基金(CSTC2008BB9342)
关键词 官僚作风 行政腐败 创业融资 金融市场 bureaucratism start-up financing administrative corruption financial market
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Kaufman D. Corruption: Some myths and facts[J]. Foreign Policy, 1997(107): 114 131.
  • 2Brunetti A, Kisunko G, Weder B. Credibility of rules and economic growth: Evidence from a worldwide survey of the private sector[J]. World Bank Economic Review, 1998, 12(3): 353-384.
  • 3World Bank. Doing Business in 2006: Creating Jobs[M]. Wahington D C: World Bank and the International Finance Corporation, 2006.
  • 4)jankov S, La Porta R, De Silances F L, et al. The regulation of entry[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2002, 117(1): 1- 37.
  • 5Huntington S P. Political Order in Changing Societies[M]. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1968.
  • 6Mauro P. Corruption and growth[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1995, 110(3): 681 -712.
  • 7Ades A, Di Tella R. The new economics of corruption: A survey and some new results[J]. Political Studies, 1997, 45(3): 496-515.
  • 8Meon P G, Sekkat K. Does corruption grease or sand the wheels of growth?[J]. Public Choice, 2005(122): 69-97.
  • 9Kaufman D, McMillan J, Woodruff C. Why do firms hide? Bribes and unofficial activity after communism[J]. Journal of Public Economics, 2000, 76(3): 495-520.
  • 10Shleifer A. Government in transition[J]. European Economic Review, 1997, 41(3-5): 385 -410.

二级参考文献124

  • 1万安培.租金规模的动态考察[J].经济研究,1995,30(2):75-80. 被引量:79
  • 2国家统计局城市社会经济调查总队.《2001年中国城市统计年鉴》[M].中国统计出版社,2001..
  • 3[1]Banfield, E. 1975: Corruption as a Feature of Government Organization. Journal of Law and Economics, 18 (2): 587 - 605.
  • 4[2]Bamathan, J. 1992: Beijing's Children of Privilege. Business Week, November 2, pp. 18-19.
  • 5[3]Becker, G. and Stigler, G. 1974. Law Enforcement, Malfeasance and the Compensation of Enforcers. Journal of Legal Studies 3(1): 1-19.
  • 6[4]Buscaglia, E. 2001: An Analysis of Judicial Corruption and Its Causes: An Objective Governing- Based Ap proach. International Review of Law and Economics. 21(2): 233-49.
  • 7[5]Chang, C. and Wang, Y. 1998: Economic Transition under a Semifoderalist Government: the Experience of China. China Economic Review 9: 1-24.
  • 8[6]Fan, G. 1988: A Theory of the Gray Market. Economic Research, August: 1-15 (in Chinese).
  • 9[7]Fisman, R. 2001: Estimating the Value of Political Connections. American Economic Review 91(4): 1095- 102.
  • 10[8]Gilley, B. 1996: Don' t Cry Uncle: Travails of Deng Xiaoping' s Niece. Far Eastern Economic Review, July 11,p. 54.

共引文献128

同被引文献104

引证文献8

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部