摘要
目的评估单纯包皮环切与原发性早泄(PPE)治疗之间的关系,为原发性早泄治疗提供客观依据。方法分析婚后6个月至3年的伴有包皮过长的原发性早泄患者116例,随机分为A、B两组,A组65例为单纯包皮环切组,B组51例为没有采取任何治疗措施的观察组。将A、B两组的治疗结果进行比较,通过统计学方法,分析其差异性,以探讨单纯包皮环切对早泄是否有治疗的作用。结果随访1年的结果显示,A、B两组都有患者的射精潜伏期达到有效(分别为15.4%和13.7%),有部分达到好转(分别为32.3%和29.4%)。分析两组结果差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。满意度的变化趋势和射精潜伏期一致。结论单纯包皮环切对原发性早泄没有明显的治疗效果。
Objective To evaluate the relationship between circumcision therapy and primary premature ejaculation （PPE）,and provide objective evidences for PPE therapy. Methods 116 PPE cases accompanied with redundant prepuce after marriage from half to 3 years were randomly divided into 2 groups： Group A （n=65） and Group B （n=51）. The patients in Group A received prepuce board circumcision while the patients in Group B received nothing. The curative effect in both groups was compared. Results Af- ter follow-up visit a year,the rate of utility in Group A was 15.4% and that in Group B was 13.7% ,and the rate of improvement in Group A was 32.3% and that in Group B was 29.4% ,no obvious difference between the 2 groups （P〉0.05）. The tendency of satisfaction was the same as latence ejaculation. Conclusion Simple prepuce board circumcision is not an effective treatment for PPE.
出处
《重庆医学》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2009年第20期2569-2570,共2页
Chongqing medicine
关键词
包皮环切
早泄
circumcision
premature ejaculation
