期刊文献+

不同麻醉方法用于小儿扁桃体、腺样体切除术中的比较 被引量:5

Comparison among different anesthesia methods for tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy in children
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的不同的麻醉方法用于扁桃体、腺样体切除的患儿血流动力学、术后苏醒过程及并发症发生的情况,探讨适合于小儿较为安全、有效的麻醉与镇痛方法。方法选择ASAI级择期行扁桃体及腺样体切除术的患儿90例,随机分为3组,I组:芬太尼-异氟醚静吸复合全麻组;II组:瑞芬太尼-丙泊酚全凭静脉麻组;III组:瑞芬太尼-丙泊酚-曲马多全凭静脉麻组,每组30例。术中分别记录三组患儿诱导前(T1)、插管时(T2)、腺样体切除时(T3)、拔管后即刻(T4)、清醒时(T5)各时间点SBP、DBP、HR、SPO2;观察3组患儿停药至气管拔管,苏醒及清醒的时间,拔管后上呼吸道梗阻或屏气,躁动,恶性、呕吐发生的情况,以及在恢复室30min时疼痛的评分。结果3组患儿麻醉诱导前、插管时、腺样体切除时,血压、心率、氧饱和度的变化无统计学意义(P>0.05);拔管后即刻,I组血压、心率分别高于II组、III组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);II组血压、心率、氧饱和度与III组相比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。停药至气管拔管时间,苏醒时间,清醒时间,I组分别长于II组和III组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);II组与III组相比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。上呼吸道梗阻或屏气、恶心呕吐、躁动I组明显多于II组和III组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);II组与III组相比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后疼痛评分,II组明显高于I组和III组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);II组与III组相比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论瑞芬太尼复合丙泊酚维持术中的麻醉,手术结束停药即给予曲马多,可获得良好的麻醉效果,诱导平稳,苏醒快,质量高。 Objective To compare the advantages and the disadvantages among the different anesthesia methods in children for tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy.Methods 90 cases with ASA Ⅰ scheduled for tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy.The children were randomly divided into three groups.Patients in group Ⅰ received Fentanil combined with Isoflurane general anesthesia;patients in group Ⅱ received Remifentanil combined with Propofol general anesthesia and patients in group Ⅲ received Remifentanil combined with Propofol and Tramadol general anesthesia.Observing SBP, DBP, HR, SPO2 at the time that before inducing, inserting tube, adenoidectomy, pulling out tube, the recovery time, incidental of side effect, and post operative pain score VAS.Results Tthere were no significant difference on the SBP, DBP, HR, SPO2 at the time before induction, intubation.After adenoidectomy in these three groups ( P 〉 0.05 ). SBP, DBP, HR in group I were larger than in group Ⅱ, Ⅲ( P 〈 0.05 ) at the time after extubation. The recovery time of anesthesia was significantly longer in the goup Ⅰ than in the group ⅡⅢ incidena of the upper respiratory tract ohstmction,nausea, vomiting, and restless more were higher in the group Ⅰ than in the group Ⅱ, Ⅲ( P 〈 0.05 ).Post operative pain score was significantly higher in the group Ⅱ than in the group Ⅰ and Ⅲ ( P 〈 0.05 ).Conclusions remifentanil combined with Propofol and Pramadol general anesthesia is a effective anesthesia methods for tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy in children,and it can wake induce stably,recover fast,and completely.
出处 《国际医药卫生导报》 2009年第19期65-68,共4页 International Medicine and Health Guidance News
关键词 麻醉方法 扁桃体 腺样体切除 小儿 Anesthesia methods Tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy Children
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献35

  • 1高峰,田玉科,刘志恒.吗啡、芬太尼和曲马多术后镇痛对病人血清β-内啡肽和白细胞介素-6水平的影响[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2006,22(1):16-18. 被引量:15
  • 2王荣金.国产曲马多与进口曲马多在术后PCEA中效果比较[J].浙江临床医学,2006,8(1):93-93. 被引量:4
  • 3Watcha MF, White PF. Postoperative nausea and vomiting. Its etiology, treatment, and prevention. Anesthesiology, 1992, 77 :162-184.
  • 4Kissin T. Preemptive analgesia[J]. Anesthesiology,2000,93 (4) :1138 -1143.
  • 5Lee CR, Mctavish D, Sorkin EM. Tramadol, a preliminazy review of its phannacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properities, and therapeutic petential in acute and chronic pain states[J]. Drugs,1993,46(3) :313 -340.
  • 6Liu K, Hsu CC, Chia YY. Effect of dexamethasone on postoperative emesis and pain[J]. Br J Anaesth,1998,80:85 -86.
  • 7Cole JW, Murray DJ, McAllister JD. Emergence behaviour in children: defining the incidence of excitement and agitation following anaesthesia. Paediatric Anaesth ,2002,12:442-447.
  • 8Martin Johr MD, Postanaesthesia excitation. Paediatric Anaesthesia, 2002,12:293-295.
  • 9Sanford L. Lapin MD, Steve M, et al. Effects of sevoflurane anaesthesia on recovery in children: a comparison with halothane. Paedistirc Anaesthesia, 1999,9:299-304.
  • 10Aouad MT, Nasr VG. Emergence agitation in children : an update. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology, 2005,18 : 614 -619.

共引文献151

同被引文献31

引证文献5

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部