期刊文献+

血管内皮生长因子D表达对肺腺癌FDG摄取程度及淋巴结转移的影响

The impact of vascular endothelial growth factor-D on FDG uptake and lymph node metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨肺腺癌中血管内皮生长因子D(VEGF—D)表达水平对病灶^18F-脱氧葡萄糖(FDG)摄取程度的影响,以及评价VEGF—D可否作为预测肺腺癌淋巴结转移的指标之一。方法使用抗VEGF—D抗体对49例肺腺癌病理石蜡包埋切片行免疫组织化学染色。所有患者常规行PET检查,感兴趣区的定量分析采用标准摄取值(SUV)。使用独立样本t检验,χ^2检验及F检验行统计学分析,使用Kaplan·Meier方法计算无瘤生存曲线(log rank分析)。结果(1)在所有病例中及在非细支气管肺泡癌(BAC)病例中,VEGF-D阴性组的FDG摄取程度明显高于阳性组(所有病例SUV分别为4.84±2.14和2.35±1.45,t=4.853,非BAC病例SUV分别为5.26±1.86和2.94±1.40,t=4.266,P均〈0.001)。(2)在所有患者及在非BAC病例中,VEGF—D阳性组中发生淋巴结转移(均为0例χ^2=18.988和15.000,P均〈0.001)及复发(均为5例,χ^2=16.432和12.255,P〈0.001和=0.001)的病例数均明显低于VEGF—D阴性组(所有患者和非BAC患者转移及复发例数均为9例和均为13例)。VEGF—D阳性组中,低度恶性的病例(2组分别为23和12例)均多于高度恶性的病例(均为8例,χ^2=10.018和6.223,P值分别为0.002,0.013)。(3)VEGF—D阳性的患者其无瘤生存率明显高于阴性者[83.33%(25/30)与23.53%(4/17),χ^2=14.05,P〈0.001]。结论高FDG摄取的肺腺癌患者VFGF—D呈明显低表达,且VEGF—D可能作为肺腺癌患者淋巴结转移、组织学分型及复发的预测指标。 Objective Lymph node status is very important for treatment decision of lung adenoeareinoma, ^18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake is proved to be an independent predictor for lymph node metastasis. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of vascular endothelial growth factor-D ( VEGF- D) expression on ^18F-FDG uptake and lymph node metastasis in lung adenocareinoma. Methods Fortynine patients with lung adenocarcinoma were enrolled. All had FDG PET scan before surgery and bad immunohistochemical staining with anti-human VEGF-D antibody after surgery. All had clinical follow-up to eighty-nine months after their primary definitive treatment. The independent t-test, χ^2-test and Fisher's exact test were used for statistical analysis. Disease-free survival probabilities were calculated with the Kaplan- Meier life table method. Results ( 1 ) Standardized uptake value ( SUV ) was higher in the patients with negative VEGF-D expression than that in those with VEGF-D positive expression (4.84 ± 2.14 vs 2.35 ±1.45, t = 4. 835, P 〈 0. 001 ). In the subgroup of patients with non-bronchioalveolar carcinoma (BAC) , SUV was also higher in the patients with negative VEGF-D expression than that in those with VEGF-D positive expression (5.26± 1.86 vs 2.94 ± 1.40, t = 4. 266, P 〈 0. 001 ). (2) Lymph node metastasis and local recurrence were more common in the patients with negative VEGF-D expression (9 lymph node metastasis and 13 local recurrence) than those in patients with VEGF-D positive expression (0 lymph node metastasis and 5 local recurrence, χ^2 = 18. 988,16. 432,both P 〈 0. 001 ). In the subgroup of patients with non- BAC the results was similar (χ^2 = 15. 000, 12. 255, P 〈 0. 001 or P = 0. 001 ). The numbers of patients with high grade malignancy were more in VEGF-D negative group than those in VEGF-D positive group ( 13 vs 8, χ^2 = 10.018, P = 0. 002). (3) Patients with positive VEGF-D expression showed a higher diseasefree survival probability [83.33 % (25/30) vs 23.53 % (4/17),χ^2 = 14.05, P 〈0. 001 ]. Conclusions It is suggested that lung adenocarcinoma with higher FDG uptake may indicate lower VEGF-D expression. For the patients with lung adenocarcinoma VEGF-D expression may be helpful to evaluate lymph nocle metas-tasis, histological subtypes and recurrence.
作者 张立娜 徐克
出处 《中华核医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第5期297-299,共3页 Chinese Journal of Nuclear Medicine
关键词 肺肿瘤 体层摄影术 发射型计算机 肿瘤转移 淋巴结 血管生成因子 Lung neoplasms Tomography, emission-computed Neoplasm metastasis Lymph nodes Angiogenesis factor
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献14

  • 1Yi-TaoJia,Zhong-XinLi,Yu-TongHe,WeiLiang,Hui-ChaiYang,Hong-JunMa.Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor-C and the relationship between lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic metastasis in colorectal cancer[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2004,10(22):3261-3263. 被引量:28
  • 2吴湖炳,王全师,王明芳,郭晓君,唐刚华.^(18)F-FDGPET显像半定量分析与肺癌病理类型及分期的关系[J].中华核医学杂志,2006,26(1):29-31. 被引量:30
  • 3Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin, 2005, 55 : 74-108.
  • 4Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Ohja B, et al. The maximum standardized uptake values on positron emission tomography of non-small cell lung cancer predict stage, recurrence, and survival. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2005, 130: 151-159.
  • 5Kramer H, Post WJ, Pruim J, et al. The prognostic value of positron emission tomography in non-small cell lung cancer: analysis of 266 cases. Lung Cancer, 2006, 52: 213-217.
  • 6Hoekstra CJ, Stroobants SG, Smit EF, et al. Prognostic relevance of response evaluation using ^18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol, 2005, 23 : 8362-8370.
  • 7Thie JA. Understanding the standardized uptake value, its methods, and implications for usage. J Nucl Med, 2004, 45: 1431- 1434.
  • 8Buck AK, Glatting G, Reske SN. Quantification of ISF-FDG uptake in non-small cell lung cancer: a feasible prognostic marker? J Nucl Med, 2004, 45: 1274-1276.
  • 9Buck AK, Reske SN. Cellular origin and molecular mechanisms of ^18F-FDG uptake: is there a contribution of the endothelium? J Nucl Med, 2004, 45: 461-463.
  • 10Higashi K, Ueda Y, Yagishita M, et al. FDG PET measurement of the proliferative potential of non-small cell lung cancer. J Nucl Med, 2000, 41: 85-92.

共引文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部