期刊文献+

症状性颅、颈部动脉狭窄在3.0T上的MRA与DSA比较研究 被引量:4

Evaluation of 3.0 Tesla MRA in diagnosing symptomatic craniocervical artery stenosis: a comparative study with DSA
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的前瞻性分析3.0T应用SENSE技术的高分辨率对比增强容积扫描MRA(CEMRA)和3DTOFMRA在临床疑有颅、颈部动脉狭窄性病变患者中的应用价值。方法46例临床怀疑颅、颈部动脉狭窄的患者接受头颅MRI平扫、头颅3DTOFMRA和颈部CEMRA检查。动脉狭窄的程度与DSA检查结果进行相关性比较。结果MRA显示各段颅、颈部动脉狭窄的不同程度和DSA检查显著相关(Rs=0.97,P<0.01)。以DSA结果为金标准,狭窄程度超过50%者MRA诊断灵敏度为100%,特异度为99.4%、准确率为99.4%。结论3.0T的3DTOFMRA和高分辨率CEMRA检查能可靠和有效地评价颅、颈部动脉狭窄性病变,可作为DSA术前必要的检查技术,或可替代传统DSA诊断性检查。 Objective To prospectively evaluate 3D time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (3DTOF MRA) and high resolution contrast enhanced volume scan magnetic resonance angiography (CEMRA) with sensitivity encoding in diagnosing craniocervieal artery stenosis. Methods Forty-six patients suspected with craniocervical artery diseases underwent MRI, 3DTOF MRA of the head and also CEMRA of the neck. The images of MRA were reconstructed with MIP and VR. The degree of arterial stenosis demonstrated on MRA was compared with that showed on digital subtraction angiography (DSA), and the data were analyzed with Spearman rank correlation coefficient (Rs). Results Excellent correlation in determining the degree of craniocervical artery stenosis existed between MRA and DSA (Rs = 0.97). With DSA as a golden standard, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MRA in detecting over 50% arterial stenosis were 100%, 99.4% and 99.4% respectively. Conclusion 3DTOF MRA and CEMRA with sensitivity encoding at 3.0T are reliable and effective examinations for evaluating cranioeervical artery disease. These techniques can be used as the necessary exams before DSA and can even substitute for the conventional DSA in some instances.
出处 《介入放射学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2009年第9期649-652,共4页 Journal of Interventional Radiology
关键词 磁共振血管成像 颅颈部动脉狭窄 数字减影血管造影 magnetic resonance angiography eraniocervical artery stenosis digital subtraction angiography
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Willinsky RA, Taylor SM, TerBrugge K, et al. Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: prospective analysis of 2 899 procedures and review of the literature [J]. Radiology, 2003, 227: 522- 528.
  • 2Nael K, Villablanca JP, Pope WB, et al. Supraaortie arteries: contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3.0 T-highly accelerated parallel acquisition for improved spatial resolution over an extended field of view[J]. Radiology, 2007, 242:600 - 609.
  • 3Wright VL, Olan W, Dick B, et al. Assessment of CE-MRA for the rapid detection of supra-aortic vascular disease [J]. Neurology, 2005, 65: 27- 32.
  • 4汪璇,李明华,方淳,潘玉萍,李文彬,乔瑞华.颅颈部动脉狭窄的增强MRA与DSA比较研究[J].介入放射学杂志,2005,14(5):468-471. 被引量:24
  • 5Choi CG, Lee DH, Lee JH, et al. Detection of intracranial atheros-clerotic steno-occlusive disease with 3D time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography with sensitivity encoding at 3T [J]. AJNR, 2007, 28:439 - 446.
  • 6Sacco RL, Adams R, Albers G, et al. Guidelines for prevention of stroke in patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack : a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Council on Stroke : co-sponsored by the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention : the American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline [J ]. Circulation, 2006, 113 : e409 - 449.
  • 7Goldstein LB, Adams R, Alberts M J, et al. Primary prevention of ischemic stroke: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council: cosponsored by the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Interdisciplinary Working Group; Cardiovascular Nursing Council; Clinical Cardiology Council; Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism Council; and the Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group [J]. Circulation, 2006, 113: e873- 923.
  • 8陆建平,刘崎,何新红,王飞,王莉,金爱国,曾浩,范明霞.三维对比剂增强MR血管成像对颈部动脉病变的诊断价值[J].中华放射学杂志,2004,38(1):76-81. 被引量:81
  • 9Ishimaru H, Ochi M, Morikawa M, et al. Accuracy of preand postcontrast 3D time-of-flight MR angiography in patients with acute ischemic stroke : correlation with catheter angiography[J]. AJNR, 2007, 28:923 - 926.
  • 10Huston J 3rd, Fain SB, Wald JT, et al. Carotid artery: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography compared with conventional angiography [J]. Radiology, 2001, 218: 138- 143.

二级参考文献19

  • 1孙鹏,彭军,宋和凤.血管内支架成形术治疗外科高危的颈动脉狭窄[J].介入放射学杂志,2004,13(3):218-219. 被引量:6
  • 2Marco JK, Schonfeld S, Keller I, et al. Contrast-enhanced carotid MR angiography with commercially available triggering mechanisms and elliptic centric phase encoding. AJR ,2001, 176:221-227.
  • 3Wutke R, Lang W, Fellner C, et al. High-resolution, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography with elliptical centric k-space ordering of supra-aortic arteries compared with selective X-ray angiography. Stroke, 2002, 33: 1522-1529.
  • 4Pan XM, Saloner D, Reilly LM, et al. Assessment of carotid artery stenosis by ultrasonography , conventional angiography ,and magnetic resonance angiography :correlation with ex vivo measurement of plaque stenosis. J Vasc Surg, 1995, 21:82-88.
  • 5Lee VS, Martin DJ, Krinsky GA, et al .Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography: artifacts and pitfalls. AJR,2000,175:197-205.
  • 6Saloner D. Preoperative evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and duplex ultrasonography with digital subtraction angiography. AJNR, 2003,24:1034-1035.
  • 7Linera JA, Leon JB, Escribano J, et al. Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis:elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography. AJNR, 2003,24:1012-1019.
  • 8Suh CD, Lee SH, Kim KR. Pattern of atherosclerotic carotid stenosis in Korean patients with stroke: different involvement of intracranial versus extracranial vessels. AJNR, 2003,24:239-244.
  • 9Time-of-Flight MR Angiography of Carotid Artery Stenosis: Does a Flow Void Represent Severe Stenosis? AJNR, 2002,23:1779-1784.
  • 10Fellner F. Different MR angioguaphy techniques provide different results in assessing extracranial carotid artery disease. AJR, 2001, 177:468-469.

共引文献99

同被引文献49

引证文献4

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部