期刊文献+

两种静脉穿刺方法对患者的影响 被引量:7

两种静脉穿刺方法对患者的影响
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的改进静脉穿刺方法,提高成功率,减少患者痛苦。方法将60例需要静脉输液的患者随机分为对照组和实验组各30例,对照组采用传统"三段式"进针法,实验组采用进针角度35-45°直接刺入血管法。观察两种不同穿刺方法所用时间、患者对疼痛的感觉及穿刺成功率。结果直接刺入血管法患者疼痛感觉轻于"三段式"进针法(P<0.01),穿刺所用时间短于"三段式"进针法(P<0.01),穿刺成功率(95.0%)高于"三段式"进针法(87.7%)(P<0.05)。结论直接刺入血管法可减轻患者疼痛,缩短穿刺时间,提高穿刺成功率,值得在临床推广应用。 Objective To improve venipuncture method, raise the success ratio, and reduce the patient pain. Methods Sixty patients who needed the venous transfusion were randomly divided into the control group and the experiment group, each 30 patients in each group. The control group used the traditional "three-stepped" needle insertion, and the experiment group used the direct needle insertion with an angle of 35-45°. The time used, patients" ache feeling and the puncture success ratio of the two different puncture methods were observed. Result Patients felt less pain (P 〈 0.01), less time was used (P 〈 0.01) and the puncture success insertion rate was higher(P 〈 0.05) when the needle was inserted directly than when the needle was inserted in three steps. Conclusion Direct method reduced the blood vessel piercing pain in patients, reduced the time, and improved the success rate of puncture, worth spreading clinically.
出处 《现代临床护理》 2009年第9期14-15,18,共3页 Modern Clinical Nursing
关键词 静脉穿刺 疼痛 护理 venipuncture pain nursing
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献6

共引文献266

同被引文献67

引证文献7

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部