摘要
目的:探讨青少年单纯性肥胖不同干预模式的可行性与效果,为制定适合本地区的长期干预模式提供临床依据。方法:随机选择克拉玛依市区在校青少年单纯性肥胖者60例,经患者自愿分为3组分别予以集体干预、家庭干预、一次性干预,通过分析3组肥胖青少年的BMI、肥胖并发症、肥胖危险因素变化,评价不同干预模式的可行性与效果。结果:集体干预模式成本投资少,但实际干预面窄、干预难度大、效果差;家庭干预模式干预面广,实际干预难度小,效果最好;个体1次性干预模式对青少年肥胖干预意义不大。结论:本地区青少年肥胖干预的重点是建立合理的膳食结构和培养良好的生活方式,家庭干预模式是实际可行性最好的干预模式。
Objective： To explore the feasibility and effect of different intervention model on simple obese adolescent, and to provide clinical evidence for making the suitable intervention model in local. Methods： Sixty simple obese adolescent chosen randomly from 224 of them were divided into three groups according to their will, collective intervention model, family intervention model and individual intervention model only once. Comparing the obese complications and BMI among three groups, to appraise the feasibility and effect of different intervention model. Results： The cost of collective intervention model was smaller, but its interventional range was narrow, putting it into practice was difficult, and the effect was bad; The range of family intervention model was wider, it is easy to implement, and the effect was better; it is meaningless for individual intervention model only once to treat obesity in adoleeent. Conclusions： In this region, raising reasonable dietary pattern and healthy life style are emphasis for intervention obesity in adolescent. The practical feasibility of family intervention model is the best in three models.
出处
《新疆医科大学学报》
CAS
2009年第8期1065-1067,共3页
Journal of Xinjiang Medical University
关键词
青少年
单纯性肥胖
干预模式
adolescent
simple obesity
intervention model
