期刊文献+

论电子证据的原件理论 被引量:91

On the Original Theories of Electronic Evidence
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 原件规则是一条古老的证据法则,电子证据是一种新型的证据,两者的结合构成了当代各国证据法的一大挑战。国外关于电子证据原件的理论有"功能等同法"、"拟制原件说"、"混合标准说"、"复式原件说"以及"结合打印说"等等。目前我国的电子证据属于混杂的体系,相应地电子证据原件规则也应当是分门别类,即推行一套多层次的理论体系。 Original rule is an ancient but important evidence role. How can it be used to the newly electronic evidence? What is the original standard of this evidenee? This article starts with an analysis of a discussion from "Original Medium Theory" to "Original Nihilism" in China, introduces and compares the mainly theories in foreign countries and international organizations, such as Functional-equivalence Principle, Fictional Original Doctrine, Mixture Standards Doctrine, Double - original Doctrine, and Conjoint - printings Doctrine. In the final section, this article focuses on how to create Chinese original theories of electronic evidence. It draws a conclusion that China may develop a variety of integrative theories in view of electronic evidence's multiple.
作者 刘品新
出处 《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第5期119-127,共9页 Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基金 国家社会科学基金资助青年项目<网络时代刑事司法的理念与制度创新>(08CFX941)
关键词 电子证据 原件 复式原件 拟制原件说 功能等同法 electronic evidence original duplicate original fictional original doctrine functional - equivalence principle
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Uniform Photographic Copies of Business and Public Records as Evidence Act, < http://www, law. upenn, edu/bll/archives/ ulc/fnact99/1920 69/upcbpr49. htm >.
  • 2Guide to Enactment of the UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Commerce, < http ://www. uncitral, org/englislCtexts/electcom >.
  • 3UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Commerce, < http ://www. uncitral, org/english/texts/electcom >.
  • 4Black Law Dictionary(7th edition), St. Paul, Minn. , 1999.
  • 5何家弘.证据法学[M].北京:法律出版社,2007:126.
  • 6Advisory Committee Notes, 56 F. R. D. 183,341, from Federal Rule of Evidence(1997-98 Edition). West Publishing Co. 1997.
  • 7United States v. Sanders,749 F. 2d 195, (5th Cir. 1984).
  • 8Donald Gene Budeson v. the State of Texas, 802 S. W. 2d 429; 1991 Tex. App. LEXIS 229.
  • 9Doe v. United States, 805 F. Supp. 1513, 1517 (D. Hawaii. 1992).
  • 10Amelia H. Boss, the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act in a Global Environment, 37 Idaho L. Rev. 27, 2001.

二级参考文献11

  • 1柯昌信.刑事证据视听资料论[J].中国法学,1996(5):86-91. 被引量:11
  • 2刘品新.论侦查学的基本原理[J].法学家,2002(1):122-128. 被引量:23
  • 3张西安.《论计算机证据的几个问题》[N].《人民法院报》,2000年11月7日.
  • 4李学军.《电子数据与证据》[A]..载《证据学论坛》第2卷[C].中国检察出版社,2001年版.第444~445页.
  • 5何家弘,张卫平主编.《外国证据法选译》(下卷),人民法院出版社2000年版,第728,722-723页.
  • 6美国《联邦证据规则》1001(3).
  • 7Eoghan Casey,Digital Evidence and Computer Crime, by Acadamic Press 2000, p. 4,p. 4.
  • 8Alan M. Gahtan, Electronic Evidence, by the Thomson Professional Publishing ( 1999 ), p. 138,p. 139.
  • 9Michael Chissick, Electronic Commerce: Law and Practice, by Sweet & Kelman 1999, pp. 143-144.
  • 10游伟,夏元林.计算机数据的证据价值[J].法学,2001(3):60-64. 被引量:58

共引文献148

引证文献91

二级引证文献791

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部