期刊文献+

回收率随机的信用组合损失的极限分布 被引量:1

The Limit Distribution of Credit Portfolios' Loss When Recovery Rate Is Random
原文传递
导出
摘要 估计组合损失常用且有效的方法是蒙特卡洛模拟,但是这种方法需要耗费大量时间。文章假设回收率是随机变量,且与违约率是相关的,得到了组合损失的极限分布函数,拓展了V asicek关于组合损失极限分布的模型。根据模型还求得了组合损失的期望、方差、受险价值和预期短缺。对比发现将回收率看做常数而忽略其波动性会低估组合损失的V aR。另外还与用蒙特卡洛模拟具体组合的结果进行对比,发现得到的模型可以很好地近似包含资产个数较多组合的损失分布,可方便地用来估计大型信用组合的损失。 Monte Carlo simulation is a commonly-used and valid technique to estimate portfolios' loss, but it consumes a great deal of time. In this paper,the recovery rate is presumed to be a random variable,correlated with the default rate. The limit distribution function of the portfolios' loss is achieved, which extends Vasicek's model. The expectation, variance, VaR and ES of the portfolios' loss are further obtained. Comparing the results, we find out that the VaR of portfolios' loss will be underestimated if recovery rate is considered as a constant and its volatility is omited. At the last, all the results obtained above are compared with the results obtained by Monte Carlo simulation. We find out that the model achieved in this paper can approximates the true distribution of the portfolios' loss quite well, and the time it consumes is short, so it can conveniently estimate the loss of large portfolios.
出处 《系统工程》 CSCD 北大核心 2009年第7期28-33,共6页 Systems Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70573076) 高等学校博士点基金资助项目(20050056057)
关键词 组合损失 蒙特卡洛模拟 回收率 受险价值 Portfolios Loss Monte Carlo Simulation Recovery Rate Value at Risk
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Vasicek O. Limiting loan loss probability distribution [R]. KMV Corporation (available at kmv. com), 1991.
  • 2Vasicek O. Loan portfolio value[J]. Risk, 2002,12: 160-162.
  • 3Huang X Z. Saddle approximation in the KMV/ Vasicek model[R]. First Conference of Advanced Mathematical Methods for Finance, 2006, Side, Antalya,Turkey.
  • 4Gordy M. Saddlepoint approximation of CreditRisk+ [J]. Journal of Banking and Finance, 2002,26 : 1335-1353.
  • 5Servigny A, Renault O, Measuring and managing credit risk[M]. McGraw-Hill,2004.
  • 6沈沛龙,崔婕.内部评级法中违约损失率的度量方法研究[J].金融研究,2005(12):86-95. 被引量:20
  • 7Dullmann K, Trapp M. Systematic risk in recovery rates-an empirical analysis of U.S. corporate credit exposures[Z]. Working paper,2004.
  • 8Rosch D, Scheule H. A multi-factor approach for systematic default and recovery risk[J]. The Journal of Fixed Income, 2005, (September).
  • 9Moody's. Default and recovery rates of corporate bond issuers 1920-2004[R]. 2005.

二级参考文献25

  • 1Acharya, Viral. V., Sreedhar T.Bharath and Anand Srinivasan, "Understanding the Recovery Rates of Defaulted Securities,"Working Paper, www. ssrn. com, 2003.
  • 2Brennan, W., D. McGirt, J. Roche and M. Verde, "Bank Loan Ratings." in Bank Loans:Secondary Market and Portfolio Management. Frank J. Fabozzi Associates, New Hope, PA., 1998,57 - 69.
  • 3Eales, R.& E.Bosworth,"Severity of Loss in the Event of Default in Small Business and l.m'ger Consumer Loans", Journal of Lending & Credit Risk Management, 1998, May, 58 - 65.
  • 4Carry, L. and D. Liebennan, "Defaulted Bank Loan Recoveries", Moody' s Special Comment, November, 1996.
  • 5Altman, Edward I. and Jason Pompeii, "The Performance of Defaulted Bonds and Bank Loans: 1987 - 2001", NYU Salomon Center Working Paper Series,January ,2002.
  • 6Hamilton, David T, Greg M Gupton and Alexandra Berthault, Default and recovery rates of corporate bond issuers:2000, Moody's Investors Service, February,2001.
  • 7Manfred Fruhwirth and I.eopold Sogner:The Implicit Estimation of Default Intensifies and Recovery Rates,2002 May 16.
  • 8Bakshi, Gurdip, Dilip Madan and Frank Zhang, "Recovery in Default Risk Modeling:Theoretical Foundations and Empirical Apphcations", FEDS,2001,2001 - 37.
  • 9Unal, H., D. Madan and L. C, untay, "Pricing the Risk of Recovery in Default with APR. Violations", Journal of Banking & Finance,2003,27(6), 1001 - 1025.
  • 10Olivier Renault and Olivier Scaillet, "On the Way to Recovery: A Nonparametric Bias Free Estimation OF Recovery Rate Densities", May, 2003.

共引文献19

同被引文献17

  • 1周晖,谢赤,高芳.同业拆借利率与上市公司资本结构的协整分析[J].湖南大学学报(自然科学版),2006,33(4):132-135. 被引量:5
  • 2BerndSchmid.信用风险定价模型:理论与实务(第二版)[M].张树德译.上海:格致出版社,2014.
  • 3BerndSchmid.信用风险定价模型:理论与实务(第二版)[M].张树德译.上海:上海人民出版社,2014.
  • 4Madan D B, Unal H. A two-factor hazard rate model for pricing risky debt and the term structure of credit spreads [J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2000,35 (1) : 43 - 65.
  • 5Duffle D, Lando D. The term structure of credit spreads with incomplete accounting information[J]. Econometrica, 2001,69 (3) : 633- 664.
  • 6Cathcart L, EI-Jahel L. Pricing defaultable bonds: A middle-way approach between structural and reduced-form models [J]. Quantitative Finance, 2006,6(3) =243-253.
  • 7Emmanuel1 F S, Helen E O. On the hybrid model for the valuation of credit risk [J]. Applied and Computational Mathematics, 2014,3 (1) .. 8 - 11.
  • 8Ba|lestra L V, Pacelli G. Va|uing risky debt: A new model combining structural information with the reduced-form approach [J]. Insurance:Mathematics and Economics, 2014,55 (2) : 26 1- 271.
  • 9Altman E, et al. The link between default and recovery Rates. Theory, empirical, evidence, and implications[J ]. Journal of Business, 2005, 78 (6) : 2203-2228.
  • 10Rudi Schafera, et al. Dependence of defaults andrecoveries in structural credit risk model ['J]. Economic Modelling, 2013,30 (1) :1- 9.

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部