摘要
宋词的词乐在元代逐渐散佚,元曲取代了宋词。二者同属于音乐文学,亦同为古典格律诗体的长短句形式,因而词与曲自元代以来在文体上出现混淆的现象。这种混淆主要源自词学内部,在词选集里混入了不少的元曲作品。清初王奕清等奉旨编纂的《词谱》一直成为词体格律的标准,编者们为备体而误收了元曲十七调。兹以曲调产生的时代、作品的文献来源、声韵的音系和体制特征作为区分词与曲的标准,对《词谱》误收之元曲进行考辨,以证实其非词调。这有助于重新编订词谱,亦有助于对词与曲体裁的区别的进一步认识。
As Song ci gradually lost its tune in the Yuan Dynasty,Yuanqu opera took its place.Both of them belong to musical literature and feature classical poetic pattern and rhyme,so the two things are frequently mixed up in style.This confusion mainly results from the research of Song ci which includes a number of Yuanqu works.In A Collection of Song Ci compliled in the Qing Dynasty,which has always been regarded as the standard of ci,17 Yuanqu tunes were mistakenly included.This paper intends to do a textual research on those Yuanqu tunes according to the time,source,rhyme scheme and systematic features so as to prove they are not ci.It is our hope that the research will,by differentiating ci and qu,be helpful for the recompiling of ci pattern and rhyme.
出处
《东南大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第4期87-92,共6页
Journal of Southeast University(Philosophy and Social Science)
