期刊文献+

剩余控制权、剩余索取权与公司绩效 被引量:9

Residual Control Rights, Residual Claim Rights and Corporate Performance
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过比较不同形式的合约分析剩余控制权存在条件,探讨特定控制权与剩余控制权之间的转化关系;结合古典边际分析框架考察生产函数中的资本与代表人力资本的剩余控制权的边际产出,将剩余控制权收益从公司绩效中分离出来;最后,引入奈特的保险机制研究剩余控制权对应的剩余索取权在公司中的转移特征,并研究公司剩余控制权的定价问题。研究发现:(1)信息不完全与谋取经济利润目的同时存在才可能形成剩余控制权;(2)剩余控制权依赖于特定控制权的界定并在其行使过程中持续向特定控制权转化,并通过委托-代理关系形成完整的剩余控制权转移结构;(3)剩余控制权转移结构决定了公司的人力资本特征,对公司绩效的影响可通过人力资本在公司生产函数中的边际产出来刻度;(4)由于人力资本的不可质押性,剩余控制权收益一定为正。 By comparing different forms of contracts we analyzed the conditions on which residual control rights come into existence and the transformation relations between particular control rights and residual control rights. Under the framework of classical marginal analysis, we examined the marginal output of capital in the production function and that of residual control rights which indicates human capital. Gains from residual control rights were separated from corporation performance. Then, by introducing insurance mechanisms raised by Knight, we studied the characteristics of a correspondence to residual control rights, namely, residual claim rights, during the transfer in the corporation. The pricing of residual control rights for a corporation was further examined in the end. The main conclusions are as follows: ( 1 )Residual control rights come into existence only when incomplete information and the pursuit of profit appear simultaneously; (2)Residual control rights depend on defining particular control rights , constantly transforming them into particular control rights during execution, and forming a complete transfer structure of residual control rights through principal-agency relationship; (3)The transfer structure of residual control rights determines the characteristics of corporation's human capital, and the effect of residual control rights on corporation performance can be scaled by the marginal output of human capital in corporation's production function. (4)Due to the fact that human capital is free of pledge, corporation's gains from residual control rights must be positive in value.
出处 《商业经济与管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第8期78-88,共11页 Journal of Business Economics
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70672089) 国家博士后基金项目(20080431083)
关键词 剩余控制权 剩余控制权转移结构 剩余索取权 公司绩效 保险机制 residual control rights, transformation structure of residual control rights, residual claim rights, company performance, insurance mechanism
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

  • 1GROSSMAN S, HART O. One Share-One Vote and the Market for Corporate Control[J]. Journal of Finance, 1988(20) : 175-202.
  • 2PAFAEL LA PORTA, FLORENCIO LOPEZ-DE-SILANES, ANDREI SHLEIFER, ROBERT W VISHNY. Agency Problems and Dividend Policies around the World[J]. Journal of Finance ,2000(55 ) : 1-33.
  • 3PAFAEL LA PORTA, FLORENCIO LOPEZ-DE-SILANES, ANDREI SHLEIFER, ROBERT W VISHNY. Corporate Ownership around the World[J]. Journal of Finance, 1999(54) :471-518.
  • 4CLAESSENS S, DJANKOV S, FAN J, LANG L. Disentangling the Incentive and Entrenchment Effects of Large Shareholdings[J]. Journal of Finance, 2002(57 ):2741-2771.
  • 5PAFAEL LA PORTA, FLORENCIO LOPEZ-DE-SILANES, ANDREI SHLEIFER, ROBERT W VISHNY. Law and Finance[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1998(106) : 1113-1155.
  • 6PAFAEL LA PORTA, FLORENCIO LOPEZ-DE-SILANES, ANDREI SHLEIFER, ROBERT W VISHNY. Investor Protection and Corporate Valuation[J]. Journal of Finance,2002(57) : 1147-1170.
  • 7刘少波.控制权收益悖论与超控制权收益——对大股东侵害小股东利益的一个新的理论解释[J].经济研究,2007,42(2):85-96. 被引量:176
  • 8SHLEIFER A. VISHNY R. Large Shareholders and Company Control[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1986,94(3):461-488.
  • 9韩德宗,叶春华.控制权收益的理论与实证研究[J].统计研究,2004,21(2):42-46. 被引量:106
  • 10刘峰,贺建刚,魏明海.控制权、业绩与利益输送——基于五粮液的案例研究[J].管理世界,2004,20(8):102-110. 被引量:323

二级参考文献71

共引文献971

同被引文献148

二级引证文献100

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部