期刊文献+

自我解释与样例学习方式对大学生数学学习的影响 被引量:6

在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 以平均数差异检验为学习材料,探讨自我解释与样例学习方式对数学概念原理掌握和问题解决的影响及其影响的延时效应。结果表明:自我解释能有效地促进概念原理的掌握和问题的解决;教学条件下的样例学习对远迁移问题的解决具有明显促进作用;自我解释与样例学习方式对大学生数学学习的影响是独立的,没有交互作用;自我解释与教学对大学生数学学习的影响具有延时效应。
出处 《黑龙江高教研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第9期188-190,共3页 Heilongjiang Researches on Higher Education
基金 教育部人文社会科学规划基金项目"样例学习与问题解决中的自我解释效应研究"的阶段性研究成果 吉林省教育科学"十一五"规划课题"大学生数学样例学习中的自我解释效应研究"的研究成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Chi M T H , Bassok M, Lewis M W , Reimann P, Glaser R. Self - explanations:how students study and use examples in learning to solve problems [ J ]. Cognitive Science, 1989, (13) :145 - 182.
  • 2吴庆麟,杜伟宇.自我解释的研究[J].心理科学,2003,26(6):971-975. 被引量:18
  • 3Catrambone R, Holyoak K J. Overcoming contextual limitations on problem solving transfer [ J ]. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning , Memory, and Cognition, 1989, (15) :1147 -1156.
  • 4邢强,莫雷.样例的编码方式对问题解决迁移的影响及心理机制[J].心理发展与教育,2006,22(2):71-75. 被引量:7
  • 5丛聪.样例学习中的渐减提示、自我解释和教学性解释对问题解决迁移的影响[D].中国优秀硕士学位论文全文数据库,2007.
  • 6Bethany Rittle - Johnson. Promoting Transfer Effects of Self Explanation and Direct Instruction [ J ]. Child Development, 2006,(77) :1 - 15.
  • 7Klahr D, Nigam M. The equivalence of learning paths in early science instruction : Effects of direct instruction and discovery learning[ J]. Psychological Science, 2004, ( 15 ): 661-667.
  • 8Ferguson - Hessler M G M , de Jong T. Studying physics text : differences in study processes between good and poor performers[ J]. Cognition and Instruction, 1990, (7) :41 - 54.
  • 9Siegler R S. (2002). Microgenetic studies of self - ex- planation[ C]. In N Garnott & J Parziale (Ed.), Microdevelopment:A process - oriented perspective for studying development and learning. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. 31 - 58.
  • 10Sweller J. (1988) Cognitive load during problem solving : Effects on learning [ J ]. Cognitive Science, ( 12 ) : 257 - 285.

二级参考文献30

  • 1李亦菲,朱新明.一种通用的口语报告编码方案[J].心理科学进展,1998,8(4):47-51. 被引量:16
  • 2Chi M T H. Knowledge structures and memory development. In: R Siegler(Ed.). Children' s thinking:What develop? Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1978:73-96.
  • 3Chi M T H, Feltovich P, Glasser R. Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Sciences, 1981, 1: 121- 152.
  • 4Chi M T H. Self- explaining expository texts: the dual process of generating inferences and repairing mental models. In: R Glaser (Ed.). Advances in Instructional Psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2000: 161- 238.
  • 5Chi M T H, Bassok M, Lewis M W, Reimann P, Glaser R. Self - explanations: how students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 1989, 13: 145-182.
  • 6Chi M T H. Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: a practical guide. Journal of the Learning Sciences,1997, 6(3) :271- 315.
  • 7Ericsson K A, Simon H A. Protocol analysis (Revised).Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993.
  • 8Wathen S H. Collaborative versus individualistic learning and the role of explanations. Doctoral thesis. Pittsburgh:University of Pittsburgh, 1997.
  • 9Chi M T H, DeLeeuw N, Chiu M H, LaVancher C.Eliciting self- explanations improves understanding.Cognitive Science, 1994, 18:439-477.
  • 10VanLehn K, Jones R M. Learning by explaining examples to oneself: A computational model. In: SChipman & A L Meyrowitz (Eds.). Foundations of knowledge acquisition: Cognitive models of complex learnin. g Boston: Kluwer, 1993: 25 - 82.

共引文献23

同被引文献45

引证文献6

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部