摘要
60年代中期,陈翔鹤的历史小说受到批判主要集中在四个方面:对陶渊明的评价,借古讽今,嵇康的叛逆精神,历史背景。他的历史小说因为坚持个性化的历史叙述,偏离了主流文学的要求而受到批判,这种政治化的批评给当时的文学创作带来了十分有害的影响。虽然他的个性化创作受到过批评,但在文学史上仍有着深远的意义和影响,不仅推动了当时历史小说创作的小高潮,而且其创作方法对后来的新历史小说创作都有很大的启发性。
During the 60s last century, Chen Xianghe′s historical novels had been criticized because of four aspects： his evaluation on Tao Yuanming, his writing being an irony to the modem time, his praise of Ji Kang′s rebellious spirit, and the historical background in his novels. Such personal narration of historical novels had been criticized because it had been considered to be a departure from the mainstream of literary creation. But this kind of criticism out of political motivation had done great harm to literary creation at that time. The author thinks that his historical novels, though being once criticized in the past, his personal narration style is still of significance in its promotion of the creation of historical novels at that time and in its influence on the creation of historical novels at present.
出处
《绵阳师范学院学报》
2009年第6期49-52,共4页
Journal of Mianyang Teachers＇ College
关键词
陈翔鹤
历史小说
陶渊明
嵇康
文学批评
Chen Xianghe
historical novels
Tao Yuanming
Ji Kuang
literary criticism
