期刊文献+

论侦查讯问录音录像制度的保障机制 被引量:35

On the Protection Mechanism of Recording and Videotaping System in Interrogation
原文传递
导出
摘要 侦查讯问录音录像制度的建立对遏制侦查人员采用刑讯逼供等非法手段获取口供具有非常重要的意义,但其功能的发挥必须具备一定的前提:对讯问活动的录制必须是全程的;必须建立完善的程序和证据规则。要保证录音录像制度在我国实践中良性运作,必须对相关制度作以下改革:强化对侦查权的控制,杜绝侦查人员在讯问程序外对犯罪嫌疑人采用强制手段;建立严格的证据规则,确保裁判者客观公正地审查录音录像材料的证据能力和证明力;完善程序规则,强化辩护方对录音录像的程序参与权。 Recording and Videotaping system is of great significance to deter investigators from exacting a confession by torture. However, the realization of the function of recording and videotaping system needs the following prerequisite : the recording and videotaping must covers the whole course of the interrogation, and rule of evidence and procedure must be perfected. In order to realize the virtuous operation of recording and videotaping system in the judicial practice, we must take the following reforms : strengthen the restriction of the investigative power and stop investigator from obtaining confession by force out of interrogation procedure; establish strict rule of evidence and enable the judge make fair and objective judgment on the probative force and credibility of recording and videotaping material; perfect procedure rule and strengthen the fight of participation of the defendant party.
作者 陈永生
机构地区 北京大学法学院
出处 《当代法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第4期70-81,共12页 Contemporary Law Review
关键词 讯问 录音录像 保障机制 interrogation recording and videotaping protection mechanism
  • 相关文献

参考文献33

  • 1林俊益.论讯问被告时之全程连续录音.万国法律,2000,(12).
  • 2张立.讯问职务犯罪嫌疑人:全程同步录音录像[N].检察日报,2007—3—8(1).
  • 3John Baldwin. The Police and Tape Recorders [J]. Criminal Law Review, 1985.
  • 4Mike McConville. Videotaping Interrogations: Police Behavior on and off Camera [ J ]. Criminal Law Review, 1992.
  • 5G. Daniel Lassiter, Jennifer J. Ratcliff, Lezlee J. Ware, Clinton R. Irvin. Videotaped Confessions: Panacea or Pandor's aBox? [J]. Law& Policy, 2006, 28 (4).
  • 6徐美君.侦查讯问录音录像制度研究[J].中国刑事法杂志,2003(6):81-88. 被引量:23
  • 7讯问嫌疑人将全程录像明年全国所有检察院施行[N].京华时报,2005-9-10(2).
  • 8林里力.上海卢湾检察院研发移动视频录音录像系统[N].浙江法制报,2007-2-8(7).
  • 9中国政法大学刑事法律研究中心.英国刑事诉讼制度的新发展——赴英考察报告[A].陈光中,江伟.诉讼法论丛:二[c].北京:法律出版社,1998.
  • 10Editorial. Recording Police Questioning [ N]. New York Times, 2004 -6- 15.

二级参考文献10

  • 1[日]田口守一 刘迪等译.《刑事诉讼法》[M].法律出版社,2000年版.第139页、第25页.
  • 2See John Sprack,Criminal Procedure,P.8-29.
  • 3See Freda Adler,Gerhard O.W.Mueller & William S.Laufer,Criminal Justice,McGraw—Hill,Inc.,1994,p.482-483.
  • 4[法]卡斯东·斯特法尼 罗结珍 译.《法国刑事诉讼法精义》(下)[M].中国政法大学出版社,1998年版.第633页.
  • 5[美]乔恩·R·华尔兹 何家弘译.刑事证据大全(第二版)[M].北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,2004.515.
  • 6William C. Liedke. Caases and Materials on the Rules of Evidence [ M ]. Olin Guy Wellborn Ⅲ ( ST. paul. minn. ,2000. 443 - 445.
  • 7Gregorz T. Jones. Lex Lies Videotape. 18U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 613(1996).
  • 8JACK B. Weinstein. Case and Materials on Evidence.The Foundation Press. inc. , 1983. 125.
  • 9[英]艾略特·戈德斯坦 白桦译.英国、加拿大刑事法庭上的照片及录像带证据[J].外国法学译丛,1989,(1):48-51.
  • 10张丽卿.刑事诉讼制度与刑事证据[M].台北:元照出版社,2002.358.

共引文献40

同被引文献398

引证文献35

二级引证文献158

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部