期刊文献+

美国反垄断法豁免中的诺尔——本灵顿原则评析 被引量:2

Review on Noerr-Pennington Doctrine in American Antitrust Immunity
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 诺尔——本灵顿原则是由美国联邦最高法院通过几个案例确立的联邦反垄断法中的一个原则,其主要含义是:根据《美国宪法第一修正案》的规定,即使竞争者通过游说政府而改变法律将会削弱竞争,其行为也不违反反垄断法。诺尔——本灵顿原则是协调《谢尔曼法》的重要目标与公民请愿权利和各级政府有效决策之间关系的产物。诺尔——本灵顿原则对中国的反垄断法执法也有一定启发意义,在执法过程应当全面协调经营者的竞争利益与其他经营者的宪法权利、与政府行为的关系。 The Noerr-Pennington doctrine is a doctrine that is set forth by the United States Supreme Court in a pair of cases for United States antitrust law. It suggested that under the First Amendment it cannot be a violation of the federal antitrust laws for competitors to lobby the government to change the law in a way that would reduce competition. Noerr may best be interpreted as an attempt to reconcile the important goals of the Sherman Act with the fight to petition and effective decision-making at all levels of government. Chinese antitrust law enforcement can draw some enlightment from Noerr doctrine. We should reconcile comprehensively the relationships among competition rights and constitutional rights and governmental actions.
作者 于朝印
出处 《西南政法大学学报》 2009年第3期78-85,共8页 Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law
关键词 美国 反垄断法 豁免 诺尔——本灵顿原则 America antitrust law Noerr-Pennington doctrine review.
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Bryan A. Garner. Black' s Law Dictionary ( 6th ed. )[M]. New York: West Publishing Co. 1990: 1145.
  • 2Maureen K. Ohlhausen, James C. Cooper, etc. Enforcement Perspectives on the Neerr-Pennignton Doctrine [ R]. An FIC Staff Report 2006:12.
  • 3Stephen Paul Mahinka. How to Preserve Your Antitrust Immunity for Lobbying and Obtaining State Actions[ C]. Morgan Lewis trade Association teleseminar Series, March 17, 2004: 3.
  • 4Wikipedia. Noerr-Pennington Doctrine [ EB/OL ]. [2008-11-15]. http://www, en. Wikipedia. org/wiki/ Noerr _ Pennington _ doctrine.
  • 5Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference V. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc. 365 U. S. 127 (1961) [EB/OL]. [2008 - 10 - 121. http ://supreme. justia, com/us/365/127/case.html.
  • 6United Mine Workers V. Penning'ton, 381 U. S. 657 ( 1965 ) [ EB/OL ]. [ 2008 - 10 - 18 ]. http ://supreme. justia, corn/ us/381/657/.
  • 7California Motor Transport Co. V. Trucking Unlimited, 404 U. S. 508 (1972) [ EB/OL]. [ 2008 - 10 - 23 ]. http://supreme. justia, com/us/404/508/index, html.
  • 8AlliedTubeV. Indian Head, Inc.,486U. S. 492(1988) [ EB/OL]. [ 2008 - 10 - 30 ] http ://supreme. justia, com/usd486/ 492/.
  • 9Federal Trade Commission, Petitioner V. Superior Court Trail Lawyers Association, et al. 493 U.S. 411 (1990). [ EB/OL]. [ 2008 - 11 - 03 ] http ://www. usdoj, gov/osg/briefs/1988/sg880014. txt.
  • 10City of Columbia V. Omini Outdoor Advertising, Inc. 499 U. S. 365 ( 1991 ) [ EB/OL]. [ 2008 - 11 - 08 ] http ://supreme. justia. com/us/499/365/.

同被引文献12

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部