1Pincus T, Sokka T. Quantitative measures and indices to assess rheumatoid arthritis in clinical trials and clinical care. Rheum Dis Clin North Am, 2004, 30:725-751.
2Cooperating Clinics Committee of the American Rheumatism Association. A seven-day variability study of 499 patients with peripheral rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum, 1965, 8: 302-335.
3Fuchs HA, Callahan LF, Kaye JJ, et al. Radiographic and joint count findings of the hand in rheumatoid arthritis: related and unrelated findings. Arthritis Rheum, 1988, 31: 44-51.
4Ritchie DM, Boyle JA, Mclnnes JM, et al. Clinical studies with an articular index for the assessment of joint tenderness in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Q J Med, 1968,37:393-406.
5Egger M J, Huth DA, Ward JR, et al. Reduced joint count indices in the evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum, 1985, 28: 613-619.
6Sokka T, Pincus T. Quantitative joint assessment in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol, 2005, 23: S58-62.
7Pincus T. The DAS is the most specific measure, but a patient questionnaire is the most informative measure to assess rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol, 2006, 33: 834-837.
8Scott DL, Choy EHS, Greeves A, et al. Standardising joint assessment in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol, 2006, 579.
9Welsing PMJ, van Gestel AM, Swinkels HL, et al. The relationship between disease activity, joint destruction, and functional capacity over the course of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum, 2001, 44: 2009-2017.
10Pincus T, Gibofsky A, Weinblatt ME. Urgent care and tight control of rheumatoid arthritis as in diabetes and hypertension: better treatment but a shortage of rheumatologists. Arthritis Rheum, 2002, 46(4): 851-854.
