期刊文献+

80岁以上股骨颈骨折髋关节置换术围手术期安全性和疗效观察 被引量:1

Perioperative safety and efficacy of hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture in patients aged 80 and over
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的评价高龄(≥80岁)股骨颈骨折患者接受髋关节置换术围手术期的安全性和有效性。方法1997年11月至2007年11月,应用全髋关节置换术(11例)或半髋关节置换术(67例)治疗78例≥80岁股骨颈骨折患者,对其术前危险因素、围手术期并发症和术后2周临床效果等临床资料进行回顾性分析。结果本组患者平均年龄(83.7±3.59)岁,其中GardenⅢ型骨折42例、GardenⅣ型骨折36例。术前应用美国麻醉医师协会分级标准评价,80.8%为高危患者;采用统计死亡率和并发症发生率的生理学和手术严重程度评分系统预测主要并发症发生32例,术后实际发生24例,观察值与预测值之间无统计学差异(P=0.205),全髋关节置换组与半髋关节置换组均无统计学差异;术后2周疼痛缓解满意率为96.2%,76.9%的患者独立或辅助下自行室内活动。结论在高龄股骨颈骨折患者,围手术期针对生理状况及手术操作的可改变指标进行有效的干预措施,采取髋关节置换术,可获得安全、有效的临床结果。 Objective To evaluate the perioperative safety and efficacy of hip arthroplasty in elderly(≥80) femoral neck fracture. Methods Seventy-eight patients over 80 years old who received hip arthroplasty, including total hip arthroplasty(THA, 11 cases) and hemiarthroplasty ( HA, 67 cases), between Nov 1997 and Nov 2007 were analyzed retrospectively. Results Of the patients, aged (83.7±3.59) years in average, with Garden Ⅲ (42 cases) and Garden 1V (36 cases) respectively, ASA classification showed that 80.8% patients belonged to high risk group preoperatively. There was no statistical difference between predicted values and observed values by Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the Enumeration of Mortality and Mobility scoring system (32 cases and 24 cases, P= 0. 205), and THA group or HA group had no statistical difference. The satisfaction index of easement of pain was 96.2%, and indoor activities with or without brace rate was 76.9% at two weeks after operation. Conclusion By the necessary intervention to the physiological status and operation methods for improving the prognosis, hip arthroplasty is a safe and effective procedure to treat the femoral neck fracture in elderly patients.
出处 《中华老年多器官疾病杂志》 2009年第3期243-247,共5页 Chinese Journal of Multiple Organ Diseases in the Elderly
关键词 老年人 股骨颈骨折 关节成形术 elderly femoral neck fracture arthroplasty
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Iorio R, Healy WL, Lemos DW, et al. Displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly: outcomes and cost effectiveness. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2001,383:229-242.
  • 2Copeland GP,Jones D, Walters M. POSSUM : a scoring system for surgical audit. Br J Surg, 1991, 78: 355-360.
  • 3郭艾.老年性骨折及其治疗[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2004,6(9):999-1002. 被引量:23
  • 4Leung JM,Dzankic S. Relative importance of preoperative health status versus intra-operative factors in predicting postoperative adverse outcomes in geriatric surgical patients. J Am Geriatr Soc,2001,49 : 1080-1085.
  • 5Cecilia R, Olof J. Primary arthroplasty is better than internal fixation of displaced femoral neck fractures: a meta-analysis of 14 randomized studies with 2289 patients. Acta Orthop, 2006,77: 359-367.
  • 6Keating JF,Grant A, Masson M, et al. Displaced intracapsular hip fractures in fit,older people: a randomized comparison of reduction and fixation, bipolar hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty. Health Technol Assess,2005,9 :iii iv,ix-x,1-65.
  • 7Mohamed K, Copeland GP, Boot DA, et al. An assess ment of the POSSUM system in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg (Br),2002,84:735-739.
  • 8谷贵山,张德宝,孙乃坤,白岩,张博皓,秦大明,孙大辉.P-POSSUM和POSSUM评分系统预测老年髋关节置换死亡率和并发症发生率的对比研究[J].中国老年学杂志,2005,25(12):1440-1442. 被引量:33
  • 9Bann SD,Sarin S. Comparative audit: the trouble with POSSUM. J R Soc Med,2001,94: 632-634.
  • 10Ramanathan TS, Moppett IK, Wenn R, et al. POSSUM scoring for patients with fractured neck of femur. Br J Anaesth, 2005,94 : 430-433.

二级参考文献10

  • 1罗先正,王宝军,任素梅.双能量X线骨密度仪用于老年髋部骨折的风险预测[J].中华骨科杂志,1995,15(5):263-265. 被引量:16
  • 2Brunelli A,Fianchini A,AIRefai M,et al. Internal comparative audit in a thoracic surgery unit using the physiological and operative severity score for the enumeration of mortality and morbidity ( POSSUM ) [J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg,2001 ;19(6) :924-8.
  • 3Mohamed K, Copeland GP. An assessment of the POSSUM system in orthopaedic surgery[J]. J Bone Joint Surg,2002;84-B(5) :735-9.
  • 4Ramanathan TS,Moppett IK,Wenn R,et al POSSUM scoring for patients with fractured neck of femur [J], Br J Anaesth ,2005 ;94 (4) :430-3.
  • 5Copeland GP,Jones D ,Walters M. POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit[J]. Br J Surg,1991 ;78:355-60.
  • 6Whiteley MS, Prytherch DR, Higgins B, et al. An evaluation of the POSSUM surgical scoring system[J]. Br J Surg,1996;83:812-5.
  • 7Sagar PM, Hartley MN, Comparison of individual surgeon's performance.[J]. Dis Colon Return, 1996 ;38:654-8.
  • 8Prytherch DR, Sutton GL, Boyle JR. Portsmouth POSSUM models for abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery[J]. Br J Surg,2001 ;88:958-63.
  • 9尹志康,何梓铭,苟欣,肖明朝.生理学和手术侵袭度评分预测泌尿外科高龄患者术后并发症的价值[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2002,23(1):43-45. 被引量:21
  • 10饶忠,黄谦,周红菊.改良POSSUM评分系统预测老年烧伤患者术后并发症的价值[J].广西医科大学学报,2004,21(1):49-50. 被引量:8

共引文献54

同被引文献3

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部