期刊文献+

ICU中老年患者中心静脉导管相关感染的临床及病原学分析 被引量:10

Gerontal patients with central venous catheter-related infection in ICU:A clinical and aetiological survey
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨ICU中老年危重患者中心静脉导管相关感染的特点、影响因素、病原学分布及耐药情况。方法收集我院ICU收治的60岁以上留置中心静脉导管患者135例的临床及病原学资料,分为感染组48例与对照组87例,对2组资料进行统计学分析。结果135例中感染48例(35.6%),其中导管定植42例(31.1%),血流感染6例(4.5%)。感染组APACHEII评分为(23±5)分,明显高于对照组的(18±3)分;导管留置时间、胃肠外营养(PN)率、气管切开率、住ICU时间及费用均高于对照组(P均<0.01),白蛋白水平低于对照组(P<0.01);病死率45.8%高于对照组的26.4%(P<0.05)。共培养出52株致病菌,革兰阳性球菌24株(46.2%),革兰阴性杆菌22株(42.3%),真菌6株(11.5%)。革兰阴性杆菌和革兰阳性球菌均有较高程度的耐药。革兰阳性菌对万古霉素最敏感,革兰阴性菌对美罗培南、阿米卡星具有较高的敏感性。结论ICU老年危重患者中心静脉导管相关感染率较高,与病情危重程度相关,费用明显增高,病原菌耐药严重。 Objective To investigate the features, risk factors as well as pathogens and resistance of central venous catheter-related infection in gemntal patients in ICU. Methods Totally 135 patients older than 60 years old in ICU were enrolled and divided into two groups, 48 cases in infection group and 87 cases in control group. Both clinical data and aetiological data were collected and analyzed. Results There were 48 of 135 cases developed catheter-related infection (35.6 % ), including 42 cases (31.1% ) were colonization and 6 cases ( 4.5 % ) were bloodstream infection. Compared with the non-infection group, the mean APACHE Ⅱ score in the infection group was significantly higher(23 ±5 vs 18 ±3, P 〈 0.01) .The duration of central venous catheter was longer, the rates of parenteral nutrition and tracheostomy were higher ( P 〈 0.01 ). The level of albumin in the infection group was lower in infection group too( P 〈 0.01 ). Otherwise, the duration and cost in ICU was much higher in the infection group than non-infection group ( P 〈 0.01 ). The mortality was higher in infection group than non-infection ogroup (45.8% vs 26.4%, P 〈 0.05) .As for pathogens,52 strains were cultured, and 24 of them were cocci(46.2%),22 of them were bacilli(42.3%), 6 of them were fungi(11.5%).All the cocci and bacilli were highly resistant to antibiotics. Cocci were most susceptible to vancomycin and bacilli were most susceptible to meropenem and amikaein. Conclusion It showed that there was high incidence of central venous catheter-related infection in gerontal patients. The incidence was associated with severity of the cases. The pathogens were highly resistant to antibiotics and would cost much more in ICU.
出处 《疑难病杂志》 CAS 2009年第6期338-340,共3页 Chinese Journal of Difficult and Complicated Cases
关键词 中心静脉导管 导管相关感染 病原学 老年人 Central venous catheter Catheter-related infection Pathogen Gerontal
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1RaM I, Hachem R, Hanna H,et al. Sources and outcome of bloodstream infections in cancer patients: the role of central venous catheters [ J ]. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis,2007,26(8) :549-556.
  • 2Wang FD, Chen YY, Chert TL, et al. Risk factors and mortality in patients with nosocomial staphylococcus aureus bacteremia[ J ]. Am J Infect Control, 2008,36(2) : 118-122.
  • 3刘大鹰,谢正福,施焕中,覃雪军,陈强,肖常青.重症监护病房与非重症监护病房中心静脉导管相关感染的对比研究[J].中国呼吸与危重监护杂志,2006,5(3):162-167. 被引量:45
  • 4Deshpande KS, Hatem C, Ulrich HL, et al.The incidence of infectious complications of central venous catheters at the subclavian,internal jugular, and femoral sites in an intensive care unit population[J]. Crit Care Med, 2005, 33 (1) : 13-20.
  • 5蔡常春,吴力群,马长林,史长涛.中心静脉导管感染的前瞻性临床研究[J].青岛大学医学院学报,2008,44(1):11-12. 被引量:9
  • 6Gamacho-Montero J, Aldabo-Pallas T, Palomar-Martinez M, et al. Risk factors and prognosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection in critically ill patienls : a muhicenter study[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2008, 34(12) : 2 185- 2 193.
  • 7Giles Y, Aksoy M, Tezelman S. What really affects the incidence of central venous catheter-related infections for short-term catheterization[J]. Acta Chirurgica Belgica,2002,102(4) :256-258.
  • 8叶文,王锦权,陶晓根,范骁钦,王秋卉.ICU中心静脉导管相关性感染的临床分析[J].安徽医科大学学报,2006,41(6):698-701. 被引量:16
  • 9Pawar M,Mehta Y, Purohit A, et al. Resistance in gram-negative bacilli in a cardiac intensive care unit in India: risk factors and outcome[J]. Ann Card Anaesth,2008,11 ( 1 ) :20-26.
  • 10Safdar N, Maki DG. Use of lock or flush solutions for prevention of bloodstream infection associated with central venous access devices: a meta-analysis of prospective, randomized trials[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2006,43(4) :474-484.

二级参考文献27

共引文献63

同被引文献81

引证文献10

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部