摘要
通说认为,孟德斯鸠的"三权分立"优于洛克的分权理论,该观点忽视了两种理论产生及历史意义的国别性。洛克的分权理论所体现的内容反映了英国的国情特征,并非不成熟的"分权"理论。其历史地位与历史意义均超越孟德斯鸠的"三权分立"理论,是自然法哲学思想中的重要转折点,对自然法的历史演进起着关键性作用。分权理论的真正奠基人是洛克,而非孟德斯鸠。
The logically coherent argument believes that Montesquieu “the separation of powers” surpasses Locker＇s decentralization theory, which neglects historic importance and their nationalities. Locker＇ s decentralization theory tailors to Britain＇ s national condition, by no means immature. Its historical situation and the historic importance surmount Montesquieu “the separation of powers”, is turning point in the natural law philosophy, which is playing the key role to the natural law historical evolution. The decentralization theory＇s genuine founder is Locker.
出处
《河南科技大学学报（社会科学版）》
2009年第3期100-104,共5页
Journal of Henan University of Science & Technology(Social science)
关键词
洛克
分权理论
孟德斯鸠
“三权分立”
Locker
decentralization theory
Montesquieu
“separation of powers”
