摘要
用核心词的阶曲线来判定语源关系,是陈保亚对历史语言学研究的最新发展。本文认为,计算阶曲线不管是以斯瓦迪士的核心词为标准,还是以陈保亚的相对有界分析所用的核心词为标准,都是不妥当的。我们用阶曲线理论来验证仙游话和北京话的语源关系,结果显示两者不同源。可见,阶曲线判定法并不科学。
It is a new development in historic linguistics to judge the genetic relation of languages by the Curve theory of Ranks put up by Prof.Chen Baoya.The paper holds that it is improper to take the Swadech's 200 basic words or the Prof.Chen's basic words in relative bounded analyzing as criteria to calculate the curve tendency.By using the theory with the cases of the Xianyou dialect and the Beijing dialect,the result shows that they have no genetic relation.It is clear that Chen's theory is unreliable.
出处
《汉语学报》
2009年第2期35-42,共8页
Chinese Linguistics
基金
教育部人文社科项目"闽语的历史层次及其演变"(06JC740014)阶段性成果之一
关键词
阶曲线
同源
标准
判定
不足
the Curve theory of Ranks
genetic relation
criteria
judge
defect
