期刊文献+

基于系统最优策略的占线交通流量分配 被引量:2

Online Traffic Distribution Based on System Optimal Strategy
原文传递
导出
摘要 针对n次连续的交通需求依次到达出发点选择路径到目的地去的问题,本文从占线与竞争策略的角度出发,研究流量是任意可分的情形下交通流量分配,采用系统最优策略分配交通需求,即每次分配流量后都能使得当前网络上所有用户花费费用总和最小。借助于变分不等式对系统最优策略进行了竞争分析,特别地,当路阻函数是系数非负的线性函数时,证明该策略是4-竞争的;当路阻函数是系数非负、度数至多是d的多项式函数时,该策略是(d+)d+1-竞争的,同时给出系统最优策略竞争比的下界是5/3。 This paper explores the issue of arriving at the starting point in file to choose the route to the destination under n sequential traffic demands. From the point of view of online and competitive strategy, we define flow as the distribution of traffic volume in arbitrarily divisible situations. A system optimal strategy is put forward to assign traffic demand under the assumption that every assignment of flow will be able to minimize the total sum of all on-line users' expenses. The System optimal strategy is analyzed bY resorting to variational inequality; the strategy is 4-competitive if the road impedance function is linear function with nonnegative coefficient, and is (d+ 1)d+1-competitive if the road impedance function is the polynomial function with nonnegative coefficient and the most degree d, meanwhile, a lower bound on the competitive ratio of system optimization strategy 5/3 is given.
出处 《系统工程》 CSCD 北大核心 2009年第3期16-20,共5页 Systems Engineering
基金 国家杰出青年基金资助项目(70525004) 国家自然科学基金重点资助项目(60736027)
关键词 占线问题 竞争比 系统最优 流量分配 Online Problem Competitive Ratio System Optimal Traffic Distribution
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Roughgarden T,Tardos E.How bad is selfish routing?[J].Journal of the ACM,2002,49(2):236-259.
  • 2Roughgarden T.The price of anarchy is independent of the network topology[J].Journal of Computer and System Science,2003,67:341-364.
  • 3Koutsoupias E,Papadimitriou C H.Worst case equilibria[A].Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1563[C].Berlin:Springer,1999:404-413.
  • 4Deng X,Papadimitriou C H,Safra S.On the comp lexity of equilibrium[J].Journal of Computer and System Sciences,2003,67(2):311-324.
  • 5Papadimitriou C H,Roughgarden T.Computing equilibria in multi-player games[A].Proceedings of SODA[C].Berlin:Springer,2005:82-91.
  • 6Manasse M S,McGeoch L A,Sleator D D.Competitive algorithms for on2line problems[A].Proceedings 20th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing[C].1988:322-33.
  • 7Harks T,et al.Nonadaptive selfish routing with online demands[Z].CAAN 2007,LNCS 4852:27-45.
  • 8Harks,Stefan.Online multicommodity routing with time windows[Z].Berlin:Konrad-Zuse-Zentrum für Informationstechnik,2007-12-28.
  • 9Harks T,Heinz S,Pfetsch M E.Competitive online multicommodity routing[Z].ZIB Report 07-16,Zuse Institute Berlin,2007.
  • 10Harks T,et al.Online multicommodity routing problem[A].Erlebach T,Kaklamanis.WAOA 2006.LNCS,vol.4368[C].Heidelberg:Springer,2007.

同被引文献14

  • 1张沈生,傅卓林,张兆弟.住宅供暖设备的评价与选择[J].沈阳建筑大学学报(自然科学版),2006,22(4):647-652. 被引量:9
  • 2黄海军,欧阳恋群,刘天亮.交通网络中用户均衡行为的效率损失上界[J].北京航空航天大学学报,2006,32(10):1215-1219. 被引量:14
  • 3Shelton J P. The cost of renting versus owning a home [ J]. Land Economics, 1968,44:59 - 72.
  • 4Sleator D D,Tarjan R E. Amortized efficiency of list update and paging roles [ J ]. Communication of the ACM, 1985,28:202 - 208.
  • 5Harks T, V' egh L A. Nonadaptive selfish routing with online demands[C]//CAAN 2007,LNCS 4852: 27-45.
  • 6Harks T. Nash equilibrium in online sequential rout- ing Games[Z]. ZIB Report 06-43,2006.
  • 7Harks, Stefan. Online multieommodity routing with time windows [ Z ]. Konrad-Zuse-Zentrum fur Information steehnik 2007.
  • 8Berlin December 28. Roughgarden T, Tardos E. How bad is selfish routing? [J]. Journal of the ACM, 2002,49 (2) : 236 -259.
  • 9Perakis G. The price of anarchy when costs are non-separable and asymmetric [C]//Proceedings of the lOth International Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization Conference, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2004,3064 : 46- 58.
  • 10张沈生,李辉,杨翠翠.基于模糊评价的小城镇供暖设备选择[J].沈阳建筑大学学报(自然科学版),2008,24(3):480-485. 被引量:7

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部