摘要
本研究通过比较不同实验方法所获得的数据来调查词汇联想测试的稳定性。所调查的3种方法包括:口头1个反应词、笔头1个反应词、笔头3个反应词。结果表明:1)口头与笔头1个反应词之间差别不大;2)笔头3个反应词之间差别较大,按第一、第二、第三反应的顺序排列,聚合型反应呈下降趋势,而语音及其他反应呈上升趋势;3)笔头1个反应词与笔头3个反应词的平均数相比较,笔头1个反应词中,聚合型反应显著高于笔头3个反应词的平均数,而语音及其他反应显著低于笔头3个反应词的平均数;4)笔头1个反应词与笔头3个反应词中的第一反应之间无显著差异。该研究结果为词汇联想测试的运用提供了实证依据。
The present study investigates the stability of word association test by comparing data obtained through three ways, namely, aural-oral-method-one-response, written-written-method-one-response, and written-written-method-three-responses. The results indicate that： 1 ） there is no significant difference between the aural-oral-method-one-response and the written-written-method- one-response; 2） there is a great difference between three responses of the written-written-method-three-responses, i. e. , the subjects produced decreasingly less paradigmatic responses and increasingly more clang-other responses; 3 ） there is a significant difference between the written-written-one-response and the mean of written-written-three-response; and 4 ） there is no significant difference between the written-written-method-one-response and the first response of the written-written-method-three-responses. The results of the present study provide empirical justification for the application of the word association test.
出处
《解放军外国语学院学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第3期42-45,87,共5页
Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages
关键词
词汇联想测试
聚合型反应
组合型反应
语音及其他反应
word association test
paradigmatic response
syntagmatic response
clang-other response
