期刊文献+

Growth and Phosphorus Uptake of Oat (Avena nuda L.) as Affected by Mineral Nitrogen Forms Supplied in Hydroponics and Soil Culture 被引量:3

Growth and Phosphorus Uptake of Oat (Avena nuda L.) as Affected by Mineral Nitrogen Forms Supplied in Hydroponics and Soil Culture
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 Plants show different growth responses to N sources supplied with either NH4^+ or NO3^-. The uptake of different N sources also affects the rhizosphere pH and therefore the bioavallability of soil phosphorus, particularly in alkaline soils. The plant growth, P uptake, and P availability in the rhizosphere of oat (Arena nuda L.) grown in hydroponics and in soil culture were investigated under supply with sole NH4^+-N, sole NO3-N, or a combination. Sole NO^- -fed oat plants accumulated more biomass than sole NH4^+ -fed ones. The highest biomass accumulation was observed when N was supplied with both NH^+ -N and NO3^- -N. Growth of the plant root increased with the proportion of NO3^- in the cultural medium. Better root growth and higher root/shoot ratio were consistently observed in NO3^- fed plants. However, root vigor was the highest when N was supplied with NO3^- +NH4^+. NH4^+ supply reduced the rhizosphere pH but did not affect P uptake by plants grown in soils with CaHPO4 added as P source. No P deficiency was observed, and plant P concentrations were generally above 2 g kg^-1. P uptake was increased when N was supplied partly or solely as NO3^--N, similarly as biomass accumulation. The results suggested that oat was an NO3-preferring plant, and NO3^- -N was essential for plant growth and the maintenance of root absorption capacity. N supply with NH4^+ -N did not improve P nutrition, which was most likely due to the absence of P deficiency. Plants show different growth responses to N sources supplied with either NH4+ or NO-3 . The uptake of different N sources also affects the rhizosphere pH and therefore the bioavailability of soil phosphorus, particularly in alkaline soils. The plant growth, P uptake, and P availability in the rhizosphere of oat (Avena nuda L.) grown in hydroponics and in soil culture were investigated under supply with sole NH4+ -N, sole NO3- -N, or a combination. Sole NO3- -fed oat plants accumulated more biomass than sole NH+4 -fed ones. The highest biomass accumulation was observed when N was suppliedw ith both NH4+ -N and NO3- -N. Growth of the plant root increased with the proportion of NO3- in the cultural medium. Better root growth and higher root/shoot ratio were consistently observed in NO3- -fed plants. However, root vigor was the highest when N was supplied with NO3- +NH4+ . NH4+ supply reduced the rhizosphere pH but did not affect P uptake by plants grown in soils with CaHPO4 added as P source. No P deficiency was observed, and plant P concentrations were generally above 2 g kg-1. P uptake was increased when N was supplied partly or solely as NO3- -N, similarly as biomass accumulation. The results suggested that oat was an NO3- -preferring plant, and NO-3 -N was essential for plant growth and the maintenance of root absorption capacity. N supply with NH+4 -N did not improve P nutrition, which was most likely due to the absence of P deficiency.
出处 《Pedosphere》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2009年第3期323-330,共8页 土壤圈(英文版)
基金 Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation Council of China (No.30660086) the Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia of China (No.200607010302) Hong Kong Research Grants Council (No.2465/05M) Hong Kong University Grants Committee (No.AOE/B-07/99) Hong Kong Baptist University Matching Research Fund.
关键词 alkaline soils nitrogen nutrition oat (Arena nuda L.) P uptake rhizosphere pH 植物生长 矿质氮 磷吸收 石竹属 燕麦 水培 根际pH值 干物质积累
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Barker, A. V. and Mills, H. A. 1980. Ammonium and nitrate nutrition of horticultural crops. Hort. Rev. 2: 395-423.
  • 2Bloom, A. J. and Sukrapanna, S. S. 1990. Effects of exposure to ammonium and transplant shock upon the induction of nitrate absorption. Plant Physiol. 94: 85-90.
  • 3Forde, B. and Lorenzo, H. 2001. The nutritional control of root development. Plant Soil. 232: 51-68.
  • 4Cramer, M. D. and Lewis, O. A. M. 1993. The influence of nitrate and ammonium nutrition on the growth of wheat ( Triticum aestivum) and maize (Zea mays) plants. Ann. Bot. 72: 359-365.
  • 5Doehert, D. C. 2002. Quality lmrorovement in oat. J. Prod. 5(1): 165-189.
  • 6Errebhi, M. and Wilcox, G. E. 1990. Plant species response to ammonium-nitrate concentration ratios. J. Plant Nutr. 13:1 017-1 029.
  • 7Gigon, A. and Rorison, I. H. 1972. The response of some ecologically distinct plant species to nitrate- and to ammoniumnitrogen. J. Ecol. 60: 93-102.
  • 8Goyal, S. S. and Huffaker, R. C. 1984. Nitrogen toxicity in plants. In Hauck, E. D. (ed.) Nitrogen in Crop Production. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. pp. 97-118.
  • 9Guo, H. X., Liu, W. Q. and Shi, Y. C. 2006. Effects of different nitrogen forms on photosynthetic rate and the chlorophyll fluorescence induction kinetics of flue-cured tobacco. Photosynthetica. 44(1): 140-142.
  • 10Guo, S., Briick, H. and Sattelmacher, B. 2002. Effects of supplied nitrogen form on growth and water uptake of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plants. Plant Soil. 239: 267-275.

同被引文献57

引证文献3

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部