期刊文献+

控股股东、利益侵占与代理成本 被引量:2

Controlling shareholder,benefit expropriation and agency cost
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 控股股东代理是公司治理领域出现的新问题,已有一些论文对控股股东侵占方式和侵占程度进行了探讨,但目前还没有针对控股股东代理成本的定量研究.通过建立实物期权模型,考虑到控股股东控制权和现金流权的不同配置情况,分析计算了控股股东的代理成本.模型研究结果认为,相对于控制权私利而言,控股股东代理成本仍处于一个较低的水平.研究同时发现,随着控股股东现金流权比例的增加,代理成本逐渐降低;随着两权分离系数的增加,代理成本逐渐增加.数值模拟同时也证明了控股股东确实存在激励效应和侵占效应. The agency of controlling shareholder is a new field in corporate governance research, and the methods of entrenchment of controlling shareholder have been researched in some papers, but the agency cost of controlling shareholder agency has not been quantitatively researched yet. By building real options models and considering the different allocation of control rights and cash flow rights, the agency cost of controlling shareholder agency is analyzed. Result shows that the a- gency cost have a lower level compared with private benefit controlling. At the same time with the increase of cash flow rights of controlling shareholder the agency cost decreases, with the increase of separation of the control right and cash flow right of controlling shareholder the agency cost increases. A numerical simulation also testifies the existenc of the incentive effects and entrenchment effects .
出处 《系统工程学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2009年第2期156-163,共8页 Journal of Systems Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70772100) 广东省哲学社会科学“十一五”规划课题资助项目(080-07) 汕头大学文科科研基金资助项目(SR08004)
关键词 控股股东 利益侵占 代理成本 实物期权 controlling shareholder benefit entrenchment agency cost real options
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Fama E, Jensen M. Seperation of ownership and control[J]. Journal of Laws and Economics, 1983, 26(3): 301-325.
  • 2La Porta R, Lopez-de-silanes F, Shleifer A, et al. Law and finance[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1998, 106(6): 1113-1155.
  • 3Shleifer A, Vishny R. A survey of corporate governance[J]. Journal of Finance, 1997, 52(2) : 737-738.
  • 4Morellee E, Wang N. Capital Structure, Investment and Private Benefits of Control [R]. Rochester, U. S. A. : Simon School, University of Rochester 2004.
  • 5刘朝晖.外部套利、市场反应与控股股东的非效率投资决策[J].世界经济,2002,25(7):71-79. 被引量:46
  • 6周建龙.完善上市公司关联交易税务规制的思考[J].税务研究,2005(11):90-92. 被引量:5
  • 7La Porta R, Lopez-de-silanes F, Shleifer A, et al. Investor protection and corporate valuation [J]. Journal of Finance, 2002, 57(3): 1147-1170.
  • 8Huang, J, Huang M. How Much of the Corporate-treasury Yield Spread Is Due to Credit Risk?[R] PA, U. S. A. : Smeal College of Business, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, 2003.
  • 9Betker A, Brian L. Liquidation costs and capital structure[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1995, 39 (1): 45-69.
  • 10Gilson S. Transactions costs and capital structure choice : Evidence from financial distressed firms [J]. Journal of Finance, 1997, 52(1): 161-196.

二级参考文献86

共引文献401

同被引文献28

引证文献2

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部