摘要
一直以来,"道德主义与审美主义"的对立是学界对待卢梭和尼采思想关系上的理论取向。卢梭在公意的基础上建立起道德的学说,但他描绘的是道德的过程而非道德的规范,可以说支撑卢梭的道德体系的是一种审美的维度上的理想标的。尽管尼采鼓吹超伦理的个体自我和权力意志,拒绝为了"永恒和谐"去规范生命个体的行为,但他的审美主义并不等于抛弃了对于世界的责任。
The relationship of Rousseau＇s and Nietzsche＇s thoughts has all the time been discussed from the opposition between ＂moralism and aestheticism＂ in the academic circle. Based upon ＂the Public Will＂, Rousseau has built the thought of morality, which describes moral process rather than moral standard. Therefore, it is an aesthetic and ideal goal that holds up Rousseau＇s moral system. Although Nietzsche＇s aestheticism refuses to limit creative potential to ＂total harmony＂, this doesn＇t mean to discard the responsibility for the world.
出处
《廊坊师范学院学报（社会科学版）》
2009年第2期11-14,共4页
Journal of Langfang Normal University(Social Sciences Edition)
基金
中国博士后科学基金资助项目"多维视野中的卢梭美学思想"(20080431183)阶段性成果之一
