期刊文献+

硫铵法与循环流化床法烧结烟气脱硫技术的比较 被引量:4

Comparison of Sintering Flue Gas Desulphurization Technology with Ammonium Sulfate Method to that with CFB Method
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 在收集国内现有烧结烟气脱硫工程监测资料的基础上,对硫铵法和循环流化床法烧结烟气脱硫工艺的脱硫效率、经济技术指标等进行了比较。分析后认为循环流化床法烧结烟气脱硫工艺是现阶段比较适合我国国情的脱硫技术。同时建议加强对脱硫副产石膏的综合利用研究。 Based on the collection of monitoring data of the existing sintering flue gas desulphurization projects domestically, the sintering flue gas desulphurization process with ammonium sulfate method and that with circulating fluidized bed method were compared in terms of desulphurization efficiency and economic and technical indexes. The analysis showed that the sintering flue gas desulphurization process with CFB method is more suitable to the situation of our country. At the same time, it was suggested that the comprehensive utilization of desulfurization gypsum byproduct should be strengthened.
出处 《烧结球团》 北大核心 2009年第2期33-36,共4页 Sintering and Pelletizing
关键词 硫铵法 循环流化床法 烧结烟气 脱硫 ammonium sulfate method,CFB (circulating fluidized bed) method,sintering flue gas,desulfurization
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献23

共引文献225

同被引文献37

引证文献4

二级引证文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部