摘要
刑法学界对同种数罪应否并罚的问题存有较大分歧。究其根源,主要在于论者忽视了同种数罪与异种数罪行为人主观罪过的本质差异。同种数罪罪过的同一性,决定了行为人主观恶性及人身危险性性质上的单一性;而异种数罪罪过的相异性,决定了行为人主观恶性及人身危险性的多重性,相互间具有质的差别。两者罪过的此种差别,使得异种数罪并罚而同种数罪不并罚具有科学合理性,有利于刑法公正及目的的实现。
Criminal sector on the problem that the same kinds of plural crimes should be concurrently punished or not has different arguments,mainly because the augmenter neglect the essential subjective differences in the nature of sin between the same kinds of plural crimes and the different kinds of plural crimes.The same sin of identity on the same kinds of plural crimes determines the behavior＇s single subjective vicious nature and personal danger.However,the different sins of the different kinds of plural crimes determine the behavior＇s multiple subjective vicious nature and personal danger with essential differences.The above-mentioned difference makes jointer of punishments for the same kinds of plural crimes and no jointer of punishments for the different kinds of plural crimes scientific and rational,which beneficially achieves the fair and purpose of criminal law.
出处
《武汉大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第1期41-45,共5页
Wuhan University Journal：Philosophy & Social Science
关键词
同种数罪
异种数罪
禁止重复追究
the same kinds of plural crimes
the different kinds of plural crimes
ban duplicated prosecution
