期刊文献+

建立上海市城市全科服务团队评价指标体系的研究 被引量:13

Establishment of evaluation index system for urban general practice service team in Shanghai
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨建立上海市城市全科服务团队评价指标体系,以提高全科服务团队管理的规范化、科学化程度。方法通过两轮改进的德尔菲专家咨询法。结果建立了一套由5个一级指标和56个二级指标组成的城市全科服务团队评价指标体系。5个一级指标分别是“人员配备”、“基础设施”、“服务数量与质量”、“继续教育”和“供需双方满意度”。同时确立了各个指标的权重,5个一级指标的权重分别是0.2153、0.1978、0.2087、0.1869和0.1923。两轮咨询中专家积极系数均为100%;专家权威程度分别为0.852和0.883;评价指标重要性的专家协调系数分别为0.251和0.411。结论本全科服务团队评价指标体系科学、合理,内容全面,操作简单,便于运用,可较好地反映上海市城市全科服务团队的工作现状,符合团队可持续发展的需要。 Objective To establish an evaluation index system for Shanghai urban general practice service team to improve standardized and scientific management. Methods The evaluation index system for Shanghai urban general practice service team was established using two rounds of Delphi consultation. Results The established system consisted of 5 first-grade indicators and 56 second-grade indicators. The 5 first-grade indicators were staffing, infrastructure, quality and quantity of service, continuing education and satisfaction degree of suppliers and demanders, with weight of 0. 2153, 0. 1978, 0. 2087, 0. 1869 and 0. 1923 respectively. The active coefficient for two rounds of Delphi consultation was both 100% . The authoritative coefficient of the two rounds was 0. 852 and 0. 883 respectively. The harmonious coefficient of importance of the evaluation index was 0. 251 and 0. 411 respectively. Conclusion Through using Delphi method scientifically and reasonably, we set up the evaluation index system for Shanghai urban general practice service team, with integral contents, strong operability and easy application.
出处 《中华全科医师杂志》 2009年第4期251-256,共6页 Chinese Journal of General Practitioners
基金 上海市公共卫生重点学科建设计划资助(08GWZX1001)
关键词 社区卫生服务 评价研究 质量指标 卫生保健 德尔菲技术 Community health service Evaluation studies Quality indicators,health care Delphi technique
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Engels Y,Dautzenberg M, Campbell S, et al. Testing a European set of indicators for the evaluation of the management of primary care practices. Fam Pract,2006,23 : 137-147.
  • 2Marshall M,Klazinga N, Leatherman S, et al. OECD health care quality indicator project. The expert panel on primary care prevention and health promotion. Int J Qual Health Care, 2006,18 Suppl 1:21-25.
  • 3丁昌慧,祁新辉,蔡辉.卫生服务评价中权重系数的测量[J].交通医学,2001,15(5):484-486. 被引量:32
  • 4孙振球,王乐三.常用综合评价方法//孙振球.医学统计学.北京:人民卫生出版社,2002:375-383.
  • 5张昌敏.德尔菲评价法[A].见曾光主编.现代流行病学方法与应用[C].北京:北京医科大学,中国协和医科大学联合出版社,1994.250-270.
  • 6李军,陈晨,彭迎春,秦天刚,邹声金,张宝敬,李占义,常文虎,梁万年.关于建立北京市农村社区卫生服务效果、效益评价指标体系的研究[J].中国初级卫生保健,2005,19(1):33-36. 被引量:16
  • 7梁万年,王红,杨兴华.中国城市社区卫生服务评价指标体系的建立[J].中国卫生事业管理,2002,18(8):460-462. 被引量:105
  • 8田园,冷玉芳,玄泽亮,张惠琴,王克利.上海市徐汇区全科服务团队人力资源现况分析[J].中国全科医学,2007,10(14):1213-1215. 被引量:7
  • 9Dickinson JA. General practice. Med J Aust, 2002, 176: 17.
  • 10Evans J, Goldacre M J, Lambert TW. Views of junior doctors on the specialist registrar (SpR) training scheme: qualitative study of UK medical graduates. Med Educ, 2002,36 : 1122-1130.

二级参考文献25

  • 1丁继红,朱铭来.试论我国医疗保险制度改革与医疗费用增长的有效控制[J].南开经济研究,2004(4):96-99. 被引量:38
  • 2李琼,文珊.商业健康保险破局之道[J].中国保险,2004(11):8-11. 被引量:5
  • 3包家明,付伟,胡斌春.社区护理人力资源管理现状分析与对策研究[J].中国实用护理杂志(下旬版),2004,20(11):61-62. 被引量:57
  • 4曾光.现代流行病学方法与应用[M].北京:北京医科大学中国协和医科大学联合出版社,1996,1..
  • 5蔡辉.卫生资源利用的综合效益及其评价(第1版)[M].上海:上海医科大学出版社,1999..
  • 6蒋烽 刘顺利.应用特尔菲(Delphi)法筛选卫生事业管理指标[J].中国卫生统计,1988,5(2):12-12.
  • 7李银河 艾尔巴比.社会研究方法[M].成都:四川人民出版社,1987.112-114.
  • 8Barbara Starfield. Health Services Research:A working model.The New England Journal of Medicine. July 19,1973;132~135.
  • 9Brown. B. Delphi process:A methodology used for the elicitation of opinions of experts. The Rand Corporation. 1968.
  • 10Arnold Leving. A model for health projections using knowlegeable information. Wld Hlth Statist Quart. 1984; 37: 310.

共引文献173

同被引文献125

引证文献13

二级引证文献62

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部