摘要
目的:通过二者的临床观察对比,探讨音频电和超短波治疗慢性喉炎的疗效。方法:对64例慢性喉炎患者分两组,音频电超短波组32例,音频电流20mA,20min,每日1次,10d1疗程,超短波治疗电流50mA,每次20min,每日一次,10d1疗程;中药组32例,均为口服清音丸,每次1丸,每日2次,10d1个疗程。结果:音频超短波组疗效优于清音丸组。结论:音频电超短波是治疗慢情喉炎的有效方法。
Objective：To discuss the curative effect of chronic laryngitis which was treated with ultrashort wave and sound frequency electric current through clinical observation.Methods：64 cases were divided into two groups,32 cases were treated with ultra shout wave and sound frequency electric current, the ultra short wave＇s current was 50 mA it lasted 20 minutes each time, once a day. The sound frequency current＇s was 20mA,the course of treatment was 10 days;32 cases were treated with Qingyin piU, one pill each time,three times a day.The course of treatment is ten days, then we observed the difference between them.Results： The curative effect of ultra short wave and sound frequency electric current was better than QingYin pill. Conclusions： Ultra short wave and sound frequency current should be the best choice of chronic laryngitis.
出处
《航空航天医药》
2009年第1期16-16,18,共2页
Aerospace Medicine
关键词
音频电
超短波
慢性喉炎
sound frequency electric current
ultrashort wave
chronic laryngitis
