摘要
"不可罚的事后行为"给人当然不可罚的印象,因而"共罚的事后行为"的概念更为准确;在本犯行为因为具有违法性阻却事由、责任阻却事由、超过追诉时效以及在诉讼法上不能证明时,能够而且必须对事后行为单独进行评价;未满十六周岁的人盗窃财物或捡拾遗忘物,满十六周岁后故意加以毁坏的,构成故意毁坏财物罪;本犯教唆他人作伪证的,可能构成妨害作证罪;杀人后碎尸的,将侮辱尸体罪与故意杀人罪数罪并罚,有助于减少故意杀人罪死刑的不当适用;间歇性精神病人伤害他人,恢复正常后不救助而导致他人死亡的,构成不作为的故意杀人罪。
The un-culpability of un-culpable subsequent conduct is often taken for granted. Hence a ＂total culpability of subsequent conduct＂ would be a more proper concept. The subsequent conduct can be and must be evaluated independently, when the defendant＇s conducts negates illegal and culpable or beyond limitation of prosecution. The defendant is convicted of damaging property if he or she commits theft or picks up forgotten property under 16 and then damage them intently after 16. The defendant who solicits other people to perjure is convicted of the crime of impairing testimony. The defendant dismembering his victim＇s body after murder should be concurrently punished for the crime of homicide and the crime of insulting the body, whose practice would be beneficial for reducing the abuse of death penalty. An intermittent mental patient who injures others when he or she is in the disorder condition would be convicted as homicide for his or her negligence of succoring the victim which leads to the death of the victim when he or she returns to normal condition.
出处
《南京农业大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2009年第1期95-103,共9页
Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
不可罚的事后行为
共罚的事后行为
法益
期待可能性
Un-culpable Subsequent Conduct
A Total Culpability of Subsequent Conduct
Lgal Interest
the Possibility of Expectance
