摘要
目的:比较64排多螺旋CT在冠状动脉检查方面相对于血管造影及16排等老式螺旋CT的冠脉造影的优越性及临床价值,并探讨64层多螺旋CT冠状动脉检查可能被低估了的准确度。方法:采集216例成功的64-SCT的冠脉造影检查结论与血管造影检查结论的比较分析。并且比较64-SCT的检查方式与血管造影和16排等老式CT机的优越性。结果:64-SCT冠脉造影在血管狭窄方面比血管造影显示的程度大,64-SCT比16排等老式螺旋CT速度更快。结论:64-SCT冠脉造影与血管造影的结果偏差可能源自客观因素,64-SCT冠脉造影的准确性可能被低估,64-SCT在冠状动脉检查方面较血管造影及16排等老式CT有其独特的优越性。
Objective： To compare the superiority and the clinical value of the 64 - SCT to those of the angiography and the 16 - SCT, and investigate the underestimated potentiality of the 64 - SCT in examination of coronary arteries. Method ：Collected the results of 216 cases which were examined by way of 64 -SCT,and compared them with those of angiography. Meanwhile , compared the superiority of the 64 - SCT to the angiography and the 16- SCT. Result： The 64-SCT is more fast than the 16- SCT,and the detect- result of 64 - SCT is more of stenosis than angiography. Conclusion ： The consequent difference between 64 - SCTand angiography might come from objective factors, and the degree of accuracy of the 64 - SCT might be underestimated, and the 64 - SCT had its unique superiorities in exami nation of coronary arteries compared with the 16 -SCT and angiography.
出处
《河北医学》
CAS
2009年第3期275-277,共3页
Hebei Medicine
关键词
64层螺旋CT
心脏冠脉检查
临床准确度
64 slice spiral CT（64 -SCT）
Coronary artery angiography
Diagnosis degree of accuracy
