期刊文献+

客体关系量表在精神疾病疗效评估中的应用 被引量:1

The clinic application of object relations scale in evaluating the curative effect of mental disorder
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨客体关系自主同一性量表(mutuality of autonomy scale,MOA)在评估精神疾病疗效中的作用。方法符合入组标准的32例分裂症(偏执型)、30例抑郁症(单相),两组患者治疗前后经罗夏测验、MOA量表、PANSS量表(阳性症状与阴性症状量表)、汉密尔顿抑郁量表评分。结果罗夏自主同一性量表与PANSS及汉密尔顿量表之间均有较好的相关;分裂症在高客体关系水平上差异显著,抑郁症在高、低客体关系水平上差异均显著;治疗前后,分裂症组的SA(分离、自主的相似活动)是显著升高,抑郁症SI(分离、自主的相互作用)显著升高,而DI(毁灭性不平衡)显著降低,这些指标或许可作为评估分裂症及抑郁症疗效的标志。结论客体关系自主同一性量表(MOA)部分指标能有效地评估精神疾病疗效。 Objective Exploring object relations scale in evaluating the curative effect of different mental disorders. Methods 32 schizophrenia patients and 30 depression people meeting the CCMD-3 diagnosis criterion were evaluated by Rorschach Mutuality of Autonomy Scale ( MOA), PANSS, Hanminlton Depression scale before and after theorapy. Results There was a significant correlation between MOA and PANSS, Hanmihon Depression scale respectively; schizophrenia patients are significant different in high object relations level before and after theorapy, depression patients are significant different in high and low object relations level, SA (Separate, autonomous parallel activity) in schizophrenia patients increase significantly, and SI (Separate, autonomous interraction) in depression patients increase and DI (Destructive imbalance) decline significantly, which perhaps are signs valuating curative effect of schizophrenia and depression. Conclusion Some variables of object relartions scale can be used in valuating the curative effect of different mental disorders.
出处 《广州医药》 2009年第2期51-54,共4页 Guangzhou Medical Journal
基金 广州市医药卫生科技项目(2006-YB-112 2007-YB-099)
关键词 客体关系 自主同一性量表 罗夏测验 精神疾病 Object relations Mutuality of autonomy scale (MOA) Rorschach test Mental disorders
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Michaelst Clair,著,贾晓明,苏晓波,译.现代精神分析的圣经-客体关系与自体心理学[M].北京:中国轻工业出版社,2002.13-23.
  • 2王峘,田凌飞.边缘型人格障碍治疗中病人与治疗师之间关系的研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2006,14(4):419-420. 被引量:5
  • 3施琪嘉,曾奇峰,译.精神分析导论[M].北京:中国轻工业出版社,2005.
  • 4孟宪璋.儿童虐待的精神动力学机制[J].上海精神医学,2002,14(2):122-124. 被引量:13
  • 5龚耀光.洛夏测验手册[M].长沙:湖南大学出版社,1991:10.
  • 6Ryan RM, Avery R. A rorschach assessment of children' s mutulity of autonomy [J]. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1985, 49: 1.
  • 7彭红军,孟宪璋,杨婵娟,龙英,郭扬波.罗夏测验客体关系相关变量在精神疾病鉴别及疗效评估中的应用[J].中国行为医学科学,2007,16(11):1000-1002. 被引量:4
  • 8Bucky. Revolution and Evolution : Abrief intellectual history of americal psychoanalysis druing the past two decade [J] . Am J Psychother, 2003, 57 (1): 1-17.
  • 9Piper. Quality of object relations as a moderator of relationship between pattern of alliance and outcome in short-term individul psychotherapy [ J ] . J Pers Assess, 2004, 83 (3): 346-356.
  • 10Tramantuno. Discriminating among subgroups of borderline personality disorder: an assessment of object representations [J]. Am J Psychoanal, 2003, 63 (2): 149-175.

二级参考文献24

  • 1李圣岗,龚耀先.精神分裂症患者与正常人的罗夏测验比较研究[J].心理科学通讯,1988,11(6):21-26. 被引量:6
  • 2唐宏宇,李从培.边缘性人格障碍:一个有待认识的概念[J].国外医学(精神病学分册),1996,23(2):71-76. 被引量:2
  • 3孟宪璋.儿童创伤与成年期的精神障碍[J].美国中华心身医学杂志,1998,2(2):122-13.
  • 4Terr LC. Clinical manifestation of childhood trauma. Am J Psychiatry, 1991, 48: 10
  • 5Fluke JD, Yuan YYT and Edwards M. Recurrence of maltreatment:an application of the national child abuse and neglect data system. Child Abuse and Neglect, 1999, 23(7) : 633
  • 6Narange DS and Contreras JM. Dissociation as a mediator between child abuse history and adult abuse potential. Child Abuse and Neglect, 2000,24(5) : 653
  • 7Eckardt MH. Infinite variety and complecity: an urgent challenge for psychoanalysis. The Journal of The American Academy of Psychoanalysis, 2000, 28(4) : 577
  • 8Chessick RD. Psychoanalysis at the end of the third millennium.The Journal of The American Academy of Psychoanalysis, 2000,28(4) : 587
  • 9弗洛伊德.论自恋:导论.弗洛伊德文集.车文博主编,长春:长春出版社,1998,(2):650
  • 10Kohut H and Wolf ES. The disorders of the self and their treatment: an outline. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 1978,59: 413

共引文献19

同被引文献24

  • 1方双虎,徐萍萍.费尔贝恩人格客体关系理论的心理治疗观[J].医学与哲学(A),2007,28(6):46-47. 被引量:2
  • 2Gertrude,Rubin Black.Developmental Object Relations Theory[J].Clinica Social Work Journal.1987(15):318-327.
  • 3Kernberg O F.Self,ego,affects,and drives[J].American Psychoanalytic Association.1982,30(4):893-917.
  • 4Grotstein JS.A reappraisal of W.R.D.Fairbairn[J].Bulletin of the Menninge Clinic.1993,57(4):421-449.
  • 5John D.Sutherland.Fairbairn’s Journey into the Interior[M].Free Associatio Books,1989:8.
  • 6William E.Piper,Scott C.Duncan.Object Relations Theory and Short-Term Dynamic Psychotherapy:Findings from the Quality of Object Re1ations Scale[J]Clinical Psychology Review,1999,19(6):669-685.
  • 7Lopez-Corvo,Rafael E.The Dictionary of the Work of W.R.Bion[M].Karna Books,2005.
  • 8M.Balint.Psychoanalytic Technique[M].Karnac Books.1985.
  • 9J Shedler,M Mayman,M Manis.The Illusion of Mental Health.American Psychology,1993,48:1117-1131.
  • 10Michelle B.Stein,Jenelle Slavin-Mulford,etc.Exploring the Construct Validity of the Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale in a Clinical Sample[J].Journal of personality assessment.2012,94(5):533-540.

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部