摘要
目的:比较应用Tecnis MF和ReZoom两种多焦点人工晶状体植入术后1mo患者视力及对比敏感度(contrast sensitivity,CS)变化情况。方法:采用同期随机对照研究,选取年龄相关性白内障患者58例(74眼),随机分为两组,ReZoom IOL组(28例,28眼)植入人工晶状体ReZoom,Tecnis MFIOL组(30例,46眼)植入Tecnis MFIOL。术后第1mo检查矫正视力、无眩光及眩光环境下对比敏感度。结果:Tecnis MF近视力优于ReZoom(P<0.05),ReZoom中视力优于Tecnis MF(P<0.05),两者远视力无显著差异。Tecnis MF在空间频率为18c/d和24c/d时对比敏感度优于ReZoom(P<0.05)。两者眩光对比敏感度在各空间频率均无显著差异。结论:Tecnis MF及ReZoom在屈光晶状体手术中,对患者预后的影响各异,因此个性化使用Tecnis MF和ReZoom IOL为影响患者预后的关键环节。
AIM; To investigate the visual quality after implantation of Tecnis MF and ReZoom intraocular lens （IOL） in patients＇eyes with cataract. METHODS;IOL implantations were performed in 58 （74 eyes） cataract patients. Among them, 28 patients （28 eyes） were randomly selected as Tecnis ZM900 IOLs group, end 30 patients （46 eyes） were selected as ReZoom group, Eyesight and contrast sensitivity with or without glare were examined 1 month postoperatively. , RESULTS; Far eyesight between two groups postoperatively is not different significantly. ReZoom is better in middle sight but Tecnis MF is better in near sight （P 〈 0.05）, Without glare, the Tecnis MF group showed significantly higher spatial contrast sensitivity than the ReZoom group In the 18c/d and 24c/d frequencies; with glare, each group showed no significantly difference in all frequencies. CONCLUSION： Tecnis MF and ReZoom IOL are new intraoculsr lens that was the recent focus clinically. It is the sticking point of choosing IOL for individual.
出处
《国际眼科杂志》
CAS
2009年第3期469-471,共3页
International Eye Science
关键词
晶状体
人工
视力
对比敏感度
超声乳化
lens
artificial
eyesight
contrast sensitivity
phacoemulsification
