期刊文献+

中国教育管理学30年:成就、特点与问题 被引量:21

30 Years of Chinese Educational Management:Achievement,Characteristics and Problems
原文传递
导出
摘要 中国教育管理学30年的主要成就表现在:建立了教育管理学科研究的组织,形成了一支专业化的研究队伍;创办了专门的学术期刊;研究成果丰硕;学科体系初步形成。主要特点有:在研究目的上,既注重创立具有中国特色的教育管理学的理论,又注重为中国教育改革的实践服务;在研究方法上,由开始比较关注一般研究方法,到后来更关注研究范式和方法论的探讨和运用;在研究内容上,在对一般研究领域进行拓展的同时,重视对中国教育改革中的重大理论及实践问题的研究;在学科体系上,既注重探讨作为一门学科的教育管理学的学科体系,也注重研究作为学科群的教育管理学的学科体系。存在的主要问题是:学科关系要进一步理顺;学科研究成果的作用有待进一步发挥;学科研究的专业化水平需要进一步提高。 The main achievements of Chinese educational management in the past 30 years are as follows: the organization of educational management disciplinary research have been estahlished; the specialized research team has been formed; the special academic journal has been established; abundant research accomplishments have been achieved, and disciplinary system has been primarily formed. The main characteristics are as follows: paying attention to not only setting up the theory of educational management with Chinese characteristics, but also serving the practice of Chinese educational reform in terms of research objective; from paying close attention to general research methods to paying more close attention to the exploration and application of research paradigm and methodology in terms of research methods; while expanding the general research fields, emphasizing the research on the major issues of theory and practice in the Chinese educational reform in terms of research contents; and paying attention to exploring not only the disciplinary system of educational management as a discipline, but also the disciplinary system of educational management as a discipline group in terms of disciplinary system. The main problems are that the disciplinary relationship should be further rationalized; the role of disciplinary research accomplishments has yet to be further developed; and the specialization level in disciplinary research needs to be further improved.
作者 孙绵涛
出处 《教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第2期21-28,共8页 Educational Research
关键词 改革开放 教育管理学 学科建设 reform and opening up, educational management, disciplinary construction
  • 相关文献

参考文献34

  • 1刘文修,王恩民.学校管理[M].北京:人民教育出版社,1987
  • 2肖宗六.学校管理学[M].北京:人民教育出版社,1988.167.
  • 3肖宗六 贺乐凡.中国教育行政学[M].北京:人民教育出版社,1996.376.
  • 4吴志宏.教育行政学[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2002
  • 5安文铸.现代教育管理学引论[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,1994
  • 6孙绵涛.教育管理学[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2007.
  • 7孙绵涛,康翠萍.论教育管理学的研究对象[J].华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),1997,15(3):22-26. 被引量:21
  • 8杨天平.论教育管理学的性质[J].教育研究,2005,26(1):17-22. 被引量:16
  • 9贺乐凡.对我国教育管理研究的若干思考[J].教育研究,2001,22(2):22-26. 被引量:20
  • 10张天雪.校长权力论[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2008.

二级参考文献56

  • 1孙绵涛.关于教育管理本质的探讨[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),1998,37(3):68-72. 被引量:11
  • 2张建新.社会机制的涵义及其特征[J].人文杂志,1991(6):27-29. 被引量:18
  • 3刘居富.中国教育管理学的百年历程与未来趋势[J].湖北第二师范学院学报,1997,20(3):1-7. 被引量:5
  • 4孙绵涛.教育体制理论的新诠释[J].教育研究,2004,25(12):17-22. 被引量:47
  • 5.现代汉语词典[Z].北京:商务印书馆,2000..
  • 6[1]Kuhn, T. , Structure of Science Revolution. 2nd[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1968.
  • 7[2]Avramidmis, E. & Simith, B.. An Introduction to the Major Research Paradigms and Their Methodological Implication for the Special Needs Research,Emotional and Behavioral Difficulties [J]. A Peer Reviewed Journal, 1999, (4).Dezin, N. K. and Lincolin, Y. S. Handbook of Qualitative Research [M]. London: Sage Publication,2000.Rock, P. Symbolic Interactionism and Ethnography[M]. Arkinson, P. , Coffey, A. , Delamont, S. ,Lofland, J. , and Lofland, L. (Eds), Handbook of Ethnography[M]. London:Sage Publication, 2001.
  • 8[3]Rothwell, R. Philosophical Paradigm and Qualitative Research[M]. J. Higgs. Writing Qualitative Research[M]. Sydney: Hampden Press,1998.
  • 9[4]Guba, E. G. The Paradigm Dialog[M]. New Delhi:Sage Publication, 1990.
  • 10[6]Tshakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. Mixed MethodologyCombining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches[M]. London: Sage Publications, 1998.

共引文献691

同被引文献157

引证文献21

二级引证文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部