摘要
宪法权利所对应的义务通常是隐含的,但其对基本权利的实现具有重要意义。对于义务主体问题,三种不同视角的分析有着不同的答案,但规范分析的方法认为基本权利的义务主体应当是国家。国家义务存在着不同的序列,二分法、义务层次理论以及德国基本权功能体系理论三种分析方法之间存在相互对应和转换关系,但其中的义务层次理论更能清晰地揭示我国宪法上国家义务的序列。就劳动权而言,我国宪法的"概括性保障条款与具体规定相结合"的规范形式为确定国家义务的内容与范围提供了规范基础。
The obligations corresponding to constitutional rights usually are implicit,which are significant to the realization of fundamental rights.In terms of the subject of obligation,there are different answers to three different perspectives.From the view of normative analysis,state is no doubt the subject of obligation.State's obligations have different typologies.There are three methods:dichotomy of obligation,theory of typology of obligations and theory of systems of fundamental right functions in Germany law,which can correspond and transform.In above three,theory of typology of obligations distinctly reveals the list of state's obligations in our constitution.As far as the right to work is concerned,our constitution shows the normative form of 'integrate recapitulative protection clause with specified provisions',which provides the norm foundation for confirming the contents and scopes of state's obligation.
出处
《浙江社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第3期44-51,共8页
Zhejiang Social Sciences
关键词
国家义务
义务层次理论
劳动权
State's Obligations,Theory of Typology of Obligations,The Right to Work
