容纳式城市发展政策:国际视野和经验被引量：20

Urban Containment Policy:A Global Experience

下载PDF

导出

摘要容纳式城市发展政策是城市成长管理政策的重要内容,也是世界各国应对城市蔓延所普遍采用的一种政策。它主要包含绿带、城市增长边界和城市服务边界三种形式,三者对于城市发展的限制程度逐次递减,而实施的灵活性和复杂程度则逐次递增。容纳式城市发展政策的国际经验表明,明确、稳定的边界和综合性的配套措施是容纳式城市发展政策成功的关键性要素。而在我国现有的容纳式发展政策中,这些要素仍然较为缺乏,政策的实施效果也不够理想。因而,明确边界划定的方法和内容、厘清各类容纳式城市发展政策之间的关联,以及完善相关的税收和土地利用控制政策,是改进现有容纳式城市发展政策实施成效较为可行的方法。 As an important component of urban growth management policy, urban containment has been widely adopted in many countries to curb the widespread sprawl. Basically, it includes three forms： greenbelt, urban growth boundary （UGB）, and urban service boundary （USB）. The strength of control of these three forms decreases, while their flexibility and complexity increase in sequence. The global experience of the implementation of urban containment policies suggests that clear and relatively stable boundaries and a comprehensive policy kit are keys to the success of urban containment policy. At the same time, the Chinese experience indicates that these elements are seriously inadequate in practice, resulting in relatively poor implementation of urban containment in the Chinese cities. Consequently, the improvement of the implementation of urban containment policy in China may depend on the clarification of the boundaries, the integration of the different urban containment policies, as well as the establishment of a more comprehensive policy kit including tax and land use regulation tools.

作者韩昊英冯科吴次芳

机构地区浙江大学土地科学与不动产研究所

出处《浙江大学学报（人文社会科学版）》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第2期162-171,共10页 Journal of Zhejiang University:Humanities and Social Sciences

基金中国博士后科学基金资助项目(20080430210) 美国林肯土地政策研究院博士论文基金资助项目(FK20080815)

关键词容纳式城市发展绿带城市增长边界城市服务边界成长管理 urban containment greenbelt urban growth boundary urban service boundary growth management

分类号 F299.1 [经济管理—国民经济] F299.2 [经济管理—国民经济]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献27

1[美]阿瑟·奥沙利文.《城市经济学》,苏晓燕、常荆莎、朱雅丽译,北京:中信出版社,2003年.
2诸大建,刘冬华.管理城市成长:精明增长理论及对中国的启示[J].同济大学学报（社会科学版）,2006,17(4):22-28. 被引量：61
3A. C. Nelson & C. J. Dawkins, Urban Containment in the United States: History, Models and Techniques for Regional and Metropolitan Growth Management, Chicago, IL: American Planning Association,2004.
4P. G. Hall, The Containment of Urban England, London:Allen and Unwin,1973.
5R. Pendall, J. Martin &. W. Fulton, Holding the Line.. Urban Containment in the United States, Washington, D. C. : The Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy,2002.
6D. N. Bengston & Y. Youn, Urban Containment Policies and the Protection of Natural Areas:The Case of Seoul's Greenbelt, http ://www. ecologyandsociety, org/voll 1/issl/art3/, 2009 - 01 - 04.
7R. Munton, London's Greenbelt: Containment in Practice, London: Allen and Unwin,1983.
8J. P, Boentje & M. S. Blinnikov,"Post-Soviet Forest Fragmentation and Loss in the Green Belt around Moscow, Russia (1991--2001).. A Remote Sensing Perspective,"Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 82, No. 4(2007) ,pp. 208 - 221.
9M. Kuhn, Greenbelt and Green Heart: Separating and Integrating Landscapes in European City Regions, Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 64, No. 1 - 2 (2003), pp. 19 - 27.
10J. Taylor, C. Paine ^. J. FitzGibbon, From Greenbelt to Greenways: Four Canadian Case Studies, Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 33, No. 1 - 3 ( 1995 ), pp. 47 - 64.