期刊文献+

地冲击荷载作用下双层结构磁流变阻尼器隔震效果的数值模拟 被引量:3

Numerical Simulation of Double Layer Vibration Isolation Systems with MRD Subjected to Ground Shock
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 在抗爆结构中,一般采用单层隔震系统进行隔震,目前单层隔震系统的最大隔震率可以达到90%以上,但在加速度峰值很高的冲击荷载作用下,隔震后的结构响应加速度仍然很大。鉴于这种情况,本文对加入磁流变阻尼器(MRD)的双层隔震系统进行了研究。针对抗爆结构的两种典型荷载,采用改进Bouc-Wen模型和模糊控制方法,利用Matlab Simulink对双层隔震系统进行了数值模拟,计算了不同荷载作用下,不同隔震系统的加速度、位移及结构的振动剂量值(VDV)的响应,并与结构采用单层隔震系统的结果进行了对比。结果表明,与单层隔震系统相比,带有磁流变阻尼器的双层隔震系统没有太多的优越性。 One layer vibration isolation system is usually used in the shock isolation of blast-resistance structures. At the present time, the largest isolation rate can reach 90 %. However, the acceleration of the structures after isolation is still very large if the peak acceleration of ground shock is very large. In order to further increase the isolation rate, a double layer vibration isolation system with Magnetorheological fluid dampers (MRD) is investigated numerically in the paper. The double layer vibration isolation system subjected to two typical ground shocks is simulated by Matlab Simulink, based on the modified Bouc-Wen model and fuzzy logic control method. The acceleration, displacement and Vibration Dose Value(VDV) of the structure under two typical ground shocks in different vibration isolation systems are calculated and the comparison of isolation effects between the one layer vibration isolation system and double layer vibration isolation system is given. It is demonstrated that the double layer vibration isolation system with MRD is no better than the one layer vibration isolation system.
出处 《防灾减灾工程学报》 CSCD 2009年第1期27-34,共8页 Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(50525825 50638030) 国家科技支撑计划项目(2006BAJ13B02)资助
关键词 单层隔震 双层隔震 磁流变阻尼器(MRD) 振动剂量值(VDV) one layer vibration isolation system double layer vibration isolation system MRD VDV
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Rabinow, J. The magnetic fluid clutch [J]. AIEE Transactions, 1948, (67) : 1308-1315.
  • 2Dyke S J, Spencer Jr B F, Jr Sain M K, et al. Modeling and control of magnetorheological dampers for seismic response reduction [J]. Smart Materials and Structures, 1996, (5) :565-575.
  • 3相恒波,方秦,王玮,龚自明.磁流变阻尼器抗爆隔震性能的数值模拟[J].振动与冲击,2007,26(11):106-111. 被引量:4
  • 4Dyke S J, Spencer Jr B F, Sain M K,et al. An experimental study of MR dampers for seismic protection [J]. Smart Materials and Structures, 1998, (5):693- 703.
  • 5Jansen L M, Dyke S J. Semi-active control strategies for MR dampers: comparative study[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 2000, 126 (8): 795- 803.
  • 6Spencer Jr B F, Johnson E A, Ramallo JC. "Smart" isolation for seismic control[J]. Frontiers of Motion and Vibration Control (Series C), 2000, 43 (3) : 704- 711.
  • 7El Wahed A K, Sproston J L, Schleyer G K. Electrorheological and magnetorheological fluids in blast resistant design applications[J]. Materials & Design, 2002, 23(4): 391-404.
  • 8Choi Y T, Wereley N M. Mitigation of biodynamic response to vibratory and blast-induced shock loads using magnetorheological seat suspensions [J]. Journal of Automobile Engineering, 2005, 219 (6) : 741- 753
  • 9严东晋.[D].解放军理工大学,2000.30-36.
  • 10李伯松.信息化战争条件下爆炸震动防护技术研究[C].中国土木工程学会防护工程分会第十次学术年会论文集,2006:57-61.

二级参考文献18

  • 1邓志党,高峰,刘献栋,杜发荣.磁流变阻尼器力学模型的研究现状[J].振动与冲击,2006,25(3):121-126. 被引量:70
  • 2Rabinow J. The Magnetic Fluid Clutch [ J ]. AIEE Transactions. 1948, 67 : 1308--1315.
  • 3Dyke S J, Spencer Jr B F, Sain M K, Carlson J D. Modeling and control of magnetorheological dampers for seismic response reduction [ J ]. Smart Mat. and Struct. 1996, 5 : 565--575.
  • 4Dyke S J, Spencer Jr B F, Sain M K, Carlson J D. Seismic response reduction using magnetorheological dampers [ C ]. Proc. IFAC World Cong. vol. L, Int. Fed. of Automatic Control, 1996 : 145--150.
  • 5Dyke S J, Spencer Jr B F, Sain M K, Carlson J D. An experimental study of MR dampers for seismic protection [ J ]. Smart. Mat. and Struct. , 1998, 5:693--703.
  • 6Jansen L M, Dyke S J. Semi-active control strategies for MR dampers : comparative study [ J ]. J. Engrg. Mech. , ASCE, 2000, 126(8):795--803.
  • 7Spencer Jr B F, Johnson E A, Ramallo J C. Smart'isolation for seismic control [J]. JSME International Journal : Special Issue on Frontiers of Motion and Vibration Control, 2000, Series C, 43(3) :704--711.
  • 8Ali K, El Wahed, John L, Sproston, Graham K, Schleyer. Electrorheological and magnetorheological fluids in blast resistant design applications [J]. Materials & Design, 2002, 23, (4) : 391-404.
  • 9Choi Y T, Wereley N M. Mitigation of biodynamic response to vibratory and blast-induced shock loads using magnetorheological seat suspensions [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part D, Journal of Automobile Engineering, 2005, 219: 741--753.
  • 10Shames I H, Cozzarelli F A. Elastic and Inelastic Stress Analysis [R]. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1992 : 120--122.

共引文献5

同被引文献36

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部