期刊文献+

64层螺旋CT延迟扫描对心肌存活性的诊断价值:与^18F-FDG PET显像对比研究 被引量:8

Delayed-enhancement in assessment of myocardial viability with 64-slice computed tomography,compared with ^(18)F-FDG PET imaging
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的以^(18)F-FDG PET心肌代谢显像为标准,评价64层螺旋CT心脏延迟增强扫描对心肌存活性的诊断价值。方法20例急性心肌梗死患者,初次心肌梗死发作2周内接受64层螺旋CT及PET检查。按照美国心脏学会推荐的方法将左心室心肌分为17节段。逐个节段进行对比并用配对McNemar检验及诊断试验一致性检验进行统计分析,了解两种方法的一致性。结果左心室心肌的17个节段中,5段心肌两种方法检测结果完全一致。10段心肌一致性好(Kappa值>0.75),2段检测结果显示两种方法一致性较好(0.40≤Kappa值≤0.75)。结论64层螺旋CT心脏延迟增强扫描与PET评估心肌存活性具有很好的一致性,是一种有临床应用前景的评估存活心肌的新方法。 Objective To assess the diagnostic value of myocardial viability by delayed-enhancement 64-slice CT compared with ^(18)F-FDG PET imaging in patients with acute myocardial infarction.Methods Twenty patients with first acute myocardial infarction outbreak underwent delayed enhancement multi-slice computed tomography(DE-MSCT)and ^(18)F-FDG PET image within two weeks.The 17 segments of the left ventricle depicted by the American Heart Association were graded:no, subendocardial,or transmural hyperenhancement on DE-MSCT.No or subendocardial hyperenhancement were expected to reflect viability.In order to determine the agreement of two methods,data of 17 myocardial segments were analyzed respectively by McNemar test and Kappa test.Results All patients were in sinus rhythm.Myocardial infarction was anterior(n= 8),anteroseptal(n=3),inferior(n=9).Analysis of assessment of myocardial viability revealed best agreement among 5 myocardial segments(Kappa=1),better agreement among 10 myocardial segments(Kappa〉75)and good agreement between 2 myocardial segments(0.40≤Kappa≤0.75).Conclusion There is high agreement between DE-MSCT and ^(18)F-FDG PET imaging in the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction.DE-MSCT is a promising method for assessment of myocardial viability.
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 北大核心 2009年第2期301-304,共4页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
基金 上海市领军人才培养基金(LJ06006)。
关键词 心肌活力 体层摄影术 发射型计算机 X线计算机 Myocardial viability Tomography,emission computed Tomography,X-ray computed
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Nikolaou K, Sanz J, Poon M, et aI. Assessment of myocardial perfusion and viability from routine contrast-enhanced 16-detectorrow computed tomography of the heart: preliminary results. Eur Radiol, 2005,15( 5 ) : 864-871.
  • 2Baks T, Cademartiri F, Moelker AD, et al. Multislice computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of reperfused acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006, 48(1):144-152.
  • 3Habis M, Capderou A, Ghostine S, et al. Acute myocardial infarction early viability assessment by 64-slice computed tomography immediately after coronary angiography: comparison with low dose dobutamine eehocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007,49(11):1178-1185.
  • 4Rubinshtein R, Halon DA, Gaspar T, et al. Usefulness of 64- slice cardiac computed tomographic angiography for diagnosing acute coronary syndromes and predicting clinical outcome in emergency department patients with chest pain of uncertain origin. Circulation, 2007,115(13) :1762-1768.
  • 5Danciu SC, Herrera CJ, Stecy PJ, et al. Usefulness of multislice computed tomographic coronary angiography to identify patients with abnormal myocardial perfusion stress in whom diagnostic catheterization may be safely avoided. Am J Cardiol, 2007, 100 (11) : 1605-1608.
  • 6Chiou KR, Liu CP, Peng N J, et al. Identification and viability assessment of infarcted myocardium with late enhancement multidetector computed tomography: comparison with thallium single photon emission computed tomography and echoeardiography. Am Heart J, 2008, 155(4) :738-745.
  • 7Baks T, Cademartiri F, Moelker AD, et al. Assessment of acute reperfused myocardial infarction with delayed enhancement 64- MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2007,188(2):W135-137.
  • 8Choe YH, Choo KS, Jeon ES, et al. Comparison of MDCT and MRI in the detection and sizing of acute and chronic myocardial infarcts. Eur J Radiol, 2008,66 (2) : 292-299.
  • 9Brodoefel H, Klumpp B, Reimann A, et al. Sixty-four-MSCT in the characterization of porcine acute and subaeute myocardial infarction: determination of transmurality in comparison to magnetic resonance imaging and histopathology. Eur J Radiol, 2007, (62) : 235-246.
  • 10朱海云,田建明,王莉,曾浩,黄胜东,徐训宇,陆健.MRI与正电子发射计算机体层、单光子发射计算机体层显像检测活性心肌的对比研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2005,39(6):593-598. 被引量:9

二级参考文献15

  • 1柳澄,秦维昌.多层螺旋CT(一)[J].医学影像学杂志,2000,10(3):194-195. 被引量:42
  • 2刘凯,柳澄,陈青华,巩若箴,夏冰.颞骨高分辨率CT各向同性的研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2005,39(1):96-100. 被引量:85
  • 3Knuesel PR, Nanz D, Wyss C, et al. Characterization of dysfunctional myocardium by positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance: relation to functional outcome after revascularization. Circulation,2003,108:1095-1100.
  • 4Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation ,2002,105:539-542.
  • 5Schmidt M, Voth E, Schneider CA, et al. F-18-FDG uptake is a reliable predictory of functional recovery of akinetic but viable infarct regions as defined by magnetic resonance imaging before and after revascularization. Magn Reson Imaging,2004,22:229-236.
  • 6Lauerma K, Niemi P, Hnninen H, et al. Multimodality MR imaging assessment of myocardial viability: combination of first-pass and late contrast enhancement to wall motion dynamics and comparison with FDG PET-initial experience. Radiology,2000,217:729-736.
  • 7Kühl HP, Beek AM, van der Weerdt AP, et al. Myocardial viability in chronic ischemic heart disease: comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol,2003,41:1341-1348.
  • 8Saini S.Multi-detecter row CT:principles and practice for abdominal applications[J].Radiology,2004,233(2):322-327.
  • 9Flohr TG,Schaller S.Stierstorfer K,et al. Multi-detector row CT systmes and image-reconstruction techniques[J].Radiology,2005,235(3):756-773.
  • 10Schoepf UJ,Becker CR,Ohnesorge BM,et al.CT of coronary artery disease[J].Radiology,2004,232(1):18-37.

共引文献86

同被引文献101

  • 1沈锐,刘秀杰,史蓉芳,田月琴,魏红星,郭风,何作祥.氧甲吡嗪在糖尿病患者^(18)F-FDG心肌代谢显像中的作用[J].中华核医学杂志,2005,25(4):224-227. 被引量:10
  • 2聂颖,高炜,王贵松,张卫芳.急性心肌梗死后心肌存活性的相关影响因素分析[J].中国医学影像技术,2007,23(5):698-700. 被引量:1
  • 3Thorn T, Haase N, Rosamond W, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2006 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation, 2006, 113(6): e85-e151.
  • 4Rizzello V, Poldermans D, Boersma E, et al. Opposite patterns of left ventricular remodeling after coronary revascularization in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy: role of myocardial viability. Circulation, 2004, 110(16):2383-2388.
  • 5Selvanayagam JB, Kardos A, Francis JM, et al. Value of delayed enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in predicting myocardial viability after surgical revascularization. Circulation, 2004,110(12) :1535-1541.
  • 6Underwood SR, Bax J J, vom Dahl J, et al. Imaging techniques for the assessment of myocardial hibernation: report of a study group of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J, 2004, 25(10):815-836.
  • 7Yao SS, Chaudhry FA. Assessment of myocardial viability with dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with ischemic left ventrieular dysfunction. Echocardiography, 2005,22 (1) : 71-83.
  • 8Allman KC, Shaw LJ, Hachamoviteh R, et al. Myocardial viability testing and impact of revascularization on prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2002,39(7):1151-1158.
  • 9Lai T, Fallon JT, Liu J, et al. Reversibility and pathohistological basis of left ventricular remodeling in hibernating myocardium. Cardiovasc Pathol, 2000,9(6) :323-335.
  • 10Schinkel AF, Bax J J, Poldermans D. Clinical assessment of myocardial hibernation. Heart, 2005,91 (1):111-117.

引证文献8

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部