摘要
目的评价冠脉内注射国产盐酸替罗非班对急性冠脉综合征(ACS)介入术后无复流患者TIMI血流的影响及安全性。方法ACS患者行支架植入术后判定无复流者46例,随机分为替罗非班组(冠脉内注射盐酸替罗非班10μg/kg)26例,硝酸甘油组(冠脉内注射硝酸甘油200μg)20例。观察给药后30minTIMI血流分级及校正的TIMI计帧数(CTFC),2d后安全性的终点及30d主要不良心血管事件(MACE)发生率。结果替罗非班组介入术后无复流患者TIMIⅢ级血流获得率显著高于硝酸甘油组(65%vs30%,P<0.05);校正的TIMI计帧数显示替罗非班组血流快于硝酸甘油组[(72±19)vs(93±22),P<0.01],两组患者30d的MACE发生率替罗非班组低于硝酸甘油组(4%vs20%),但差异未达到显著水平。替罗非班组出血不良反应较硝酸甘油组略高(12%vs10%),但差别无统计学意义,两组均未见血小板减少。结论冠脉内注射国产盐酸替罗非班治疗ACS介入术后无复流患者是有效和安全的。
AIM To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intracoronary tirofiban on TIMI flow in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with no-reflow after PCI. METHODS Forty-six ACS patients with no-reflow after stenting were randomized to tirofiban group (intracoronary tirofiban, 10 μg/kg, n = 26) and nitroglyceride group (intracoronary nitroglyceride, 200 μg, n = 20). Targets to be observed consisted of corrected TIMI frame count (CTFC) , TIMI flow at 30-minute post-medication, safety end-points of 2-day post-PCI and incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) of 30-day post-PCI. RESULTS The TIMI 3 ratio in tirofiban group was markedly higher than that in nitroglyceride group (65% vs 30% , P 〈 0.05 ). CTFC showed that the coronary blood flow in tirofiban group was faster than that in nitroglyceride group (72±19 vs 93 ±22, P〈0.01 ). No significant difference was found in the incidence of MACE of 30-day post-PCI and bleeding events between tirofiban and nitroglyceride groups (4% vs 20% ; 12% vs 10% ). No thrombocytopenia was observed in the two groups. CONCLUSION The administration of intracoronary tirofiban is effective and safe for ACS patients with no-reflow after PCI.
出处
《心脏杂志》
CAS
2009年第1期66-68,共3页
Chinese Heart Journal
关键词
急性冠脉综合征
替罗非班
无复流
介入治疗
acute coronary syndrome
tirofiban
no-reflow
percutaneous coronary intervention