期刊文献+

腹腔镜与开腹结直肠癌根治术后全身炎症反应综合征比较 被引量:6

Systemic inflammatory response syndrome in open versus laparoscopic radical resection on colorectal cancer:a prospective study
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察腹腔镜和开腹结直肠癌根治术患者术后全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)的发生,比较两种不同手术方式对患者的创伤程度。方法将85例结直肠癌患者分成开腹手术组(OP组,n=33)和腹腔镜手术组(LP组,n=52),检测术后患者SIRS发生率和持续时间,采用酶联免疫吸附法(ELISA)连续检测血清肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)-α、白细胞介素(IL)-6及IL-10水平。结果与OP组比较,LP组患者血清TNF—α和IL-6水平明显降低,IL-10水平升高,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01)。LP组SIRS发生率为36.5%,低于OP组的63.6%(P〈0.01),SIRS持续时间短于OP组(P〈0.05)。结论腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术术后患者SIRS发生率和程度较低,对机体创伤较小。 Objective To compare the surgical invasiveness of laparoscopic radical resection on colorectal cancer with that of open surgery when the invasiveness is evaluated by the incidence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). Methods Patients with colorectal cancer who underwent open radical resection ( OP group, 33 patients) and those who underwent laparoscopic radical resection ( LP group,52 patients) were included in this study. We prospectly investigated the incidence and duration of SIRS in the two groups. Enzyme-linked immunoadsorbent assay (ELISA) was used to determine the serum levels of tumor necrosis factor alpha ( TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and interleukin-10 (IL-10) at the beginning of surgery and on 1,3,5,7 day after surgery. Results No patient had any severe or life-threatening complications. Levels of TNF-α and IL-6 in patients received laparoscopic radical resection were significantly lower than those in control group (P 〈 0.01 ), meanwhile, IL-10 concentration in LP group significantly higher than OP group. The incidence of SIRS in LP group was 36.5% , which was lower significantly than OP group (63.6% ,P 〈0.01 ). The mean duration of SIRS was 4.8 days in the open group and 2.7 days in the laparoscopic group ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion Laparoscopic radical resection seems less invasive than open surgery,when the magnitude of the invasiveness is evaluated by the incidence of SIRS.
出处 《中华实验外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第3期383-385,共3页 Chinese Journal of Experimental Surgery
关键词 结直肠肿瘤 腹腔镜术 全身炎症反应综合征 炎症因子 Colorectal neoplasms Laparoscopy Systemic inflammatory response syndrome Inflammatory factor
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Kishino T, Hosokawa Y,Torimoto K, et al. Assessment of surgical invasiveness of augmentation ileocystoplasty applying the systemic inflammatory response syndrome score in patients with spina bifida. Jpn J Urol,2002 ,236 :681-385.
  • 2Hildebrandt U, Kessler K, Plusczyk T, et al. Comparison of surgical stress between laparoscopic and open colonic resections. Surg Endosc, 2003,17 : 242-246.
  • 3American college of chest physicians society of critical care medicine conscnsus conference. Defmitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. Crit Care Med, 1992,20 : 864 -874.
  • 4Indupur RR,Nerli RB, Reddy MN,et al. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for large pheochromocytoma. BJU Int ,2007,100 : 1126-1129.
  • 5Lee J, El-Tamer M, Schifftner T, et al. Open and laparoscopic adrenalectomy:analysis of the national surgical quality improvement program. J Am Coll Surg,2008 ,206 :953-959.
  • 6Staudacher C, Vignali A, Saverio DP, et al. Laparoscopic vs. open total mesorectal excision in unselected patients with rectal cancer: impact on early outcome. Dis Colon Rectum,2007,50:1324-1331.
  • 7Mutou M, Takeyama K, Nishiyama T, et al. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome in open versus laparosc Picadrenalectrmy. Urology, 2004,64 : 422 -426.
  • 8徐发良,李磊,吕凤林,顾长国,徐祥,胡承香,尹华华.手术创伤后Toll样受体4/髓样分化蛋白-2的表达[J].中华实验外科杂志,2005,22(7):810-812. 被引量:7
  • 9Verkooijen HM, Fioretta G, Rapiti E, et al. Family history of breast or ovarian cancer modifies the risk of secondary leukemia after breast cancer:results from a population-based study. Int J Cancer, 2008, 122:1114-1117.
  • 10Miettinen M, Kraszewska E, Sobin LH, et al. A nonrandom association between gastrointestinal stromal tumors and myeloid leukemia. Cancer, 2008,112 : 645-649.

二级参考文献9

  • 1Carrillo-Esper R. Innate immunity, Toll receptor and sepsis. Cir Cir,2003, 71: 252-258.
  • 2Miyake K. Endotoxin recognition molecules, Toll-like receptor 4-MD2. Semin Immunol, 2004, 16:11-16.
  • 3Kalis C, Kanzler B, Lembo A, et al. Toll-like receptor 4 expression levels determine the degree of LPS-susceptibility in mice. Eur J Immunol,2003, 33:798-805.
  • 4Lequier LL, Nikaidoh H, Leonard SR, et al. Preoperative and postoperative endotoxemia in children with congenital heart disease. Chest,2000, 117:1706-1712.
  • 5Hynes-Gay P, Lalla P, Leo M, et al. Understanding sepsis: from SIRS to septic shock. Dynamics, 2002, 13:17-20.
  • 6Lepper PM, Held TK, Schneider EM, et al. Clinical implications of antibiotic-induced endotoxin release in septic shock. Intensive Care Med,2002, 28: 824-833.
  • 7Visintin A, Mazzoni A, Spitzer JA, et al. Secreted MD-2 is a large polymeric protein that efficiently confers lipopolysaccharide sensitivity to Toll-like receptor 4. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2001, 98:12156-12161.
  • 8Gioannini TL, Teghanemt A, Zhang D, et al. Isolation of an endotoxinMD-2 complex that produces Toll-like receptor 4-dependent cell activation at picomolar concentrations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2004, 101:4186-4191.
  • 9Conti P, Kempuraj D, Kandere K, et al. IL-10, an inflammatory/inhibitory cytokine, but not always. Immunol Lett, 2003, 86:123-129.

共引文献6

同被引文献37

引证文献6

二级引证文献67

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部