期刊文献+

沙地果树水雾微喷灌高效节水技术研究 被引量:4

Studies on Water-saving Technique by Micro-spray Irrigation of Fruit Tree Growing on Sandy Soil
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 沙地果树采用水雾微喷灌较大水漫灌节水36.3%;0~20 cm、21~40 cm、41~60 cm土层的土壤容重,水雾微喷比大水漫灌分别降低5.5%、3.0%和1.2%,土壤总孔隙度分别增加8%、2.3%和9.5%;0~20 cm、21~40 cm、41~60 cm土层土壤持水量比大水漫灌分别增加10.9%、17.1%和15.4%;果园中午水雾微喷灌1h后,树下气温从30.7℃降到27.2℃,相对湿度从65.1%提高到75.6%;水雾微喷新梢生长量增加14.0%,树冠投影面积增加14.2%;水雾微喷灌,李子单产与单果重分别增加了22.5%和9.7%,可溶性固型物含量降低2.7%。水雾微喷改善了土壤物理性质,增加了土壤孔隙度,提高了各层土壤持水量,且地表不形成径流,土壤保水保肥作用明显增强。 Micro-spray irrigation could save 36.3% of water comparing with flooding irrigation of fruit tree growing on sandy soil. For 0-20cm, 21-40cm and 41-60cm layer, the soil bulk density of the micro-spray irri respectively 8 layer, the soil gation was 5.5%, 3.0% and 1.2% less than that of flooding irrigation, while the soil porosity was %, 2.3% and 9.5% higher, respectively. On the other hand, for 0-20cm, 21-40cm and 41-60cm water content of the micro-spray irrigation increased 10.9%, 17.1% and 15.4%. When trees 30.7℃ to 27.2℃, while the relative humidity increased from 65.1% to 75.6%. The newer branches' growth rate increased 14.0%, and canopy projection area enhanced 14.2% by micro-spray irrigation. The yield and single fruit weight of plum increased 22% and 9.7%, while soluble solid of fruit declined 2.7%. Therefore, micro-spray irrigation improved the soil physical properties, soil porosity and soil water content. Micro-spray irrigation avoided surface runoff and significantly enhanced the water and fertilizers conservation.
出处 《吉林农业科学》 CSCD 2009年第1期54-56,共3页 Journal of Jilin Agricultural Sciences
基金 科技部农业科技成果转化资金项目(03EFN216900279)
关键词 沙地 果树 水雾微喷 高效节水 Sandy soil Fruit tree Micro-spray irrigation Water-saving
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献13

  • 1李永泽,赵锦忠.山坡丘陵地果树皿灌器的研制及应用效果[J].中国果树,1996(4):1-3. 被引量:2
  • 2宋磊,节水农业研究,1992年,239页
  • 3文云朝,节水农业研究,1992年,217页
  • 4杨诗秀,农业用水有效性研究,1992年,150页
  • 5林龙海,灌溉(译),1988年,31页
  • 6Abrisqueta J M,Hernansaez A,Frnco J A. Root dynamics of young Almond trees under different drip irrigation rates[J]. J Hort Scie, 1994,69(2):237-242.
  • 7Castel, J R. A comparative study of young Thompson seedless grapevines under drip and Furrow irrigation. I. Root and soil water distributions[J].Scie Hort, 1995,60:235-249.
  • 8Francisco A,larry E,Williams M. A comparative study of young Thompson seedless grapevine under drip and furrow irrigation.II.Growth, water use efficiency and nitrogen Partitioning[J].Scie Hort, 1997,60: 251-265.
  • 9Mongi Z, Lawrens R. Water relations of grapefruit trees in response to drip, microsprinkler, and overhead sprinkler irrigation[J]. J Amer Soci Hort Scie, 1988,113(6):819-823.
  • 10康绍忠,马孝义,韩克敏,李靖,毛敏.21世纪的农业水土工程[J].干旱地区农业研究,1999,17(1):1-6. 被引量:14

共引文献29

同被引文献90

引证文献4

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部